1 January 2013, 11:08
1 January 2013, 11:52
Good find BP.
Top link was really good, except the WW3 bit. The rest is already happening, so it's a bit of a cop out. It's like me saying, the crap already going on will continue. But still, I agree.
Some other links are extreme, but many are plausible.
Top link was really good, except the WW3 bit. The rest is already happening, so it's a bit of a cop out. It's like me saying, the crap already going on will continue. But still, I agree.
Some other links are extreme, but many are plausible.
1 January 2013, 12:30
its just a list! i havent been through the lot to say this ones good this one isnt! and i'm not going too, i've got better things to do!
1 January 2013, 21:38
We're too soon for WW3 but it's in the planning.
2 January 2013, 17:41
(1 January 2013, 21:38)cryingfreeman Wrote: [ -> ]We're too soon for WW3 but it's in the planning.Why too soon?Assuming an Israeli strike on Iran is the likeliest precursor to a 'wider conflict',they've got a very limited window.
2 January 2013, 21:59
The plan is for an eventual WW3 but not before all the infrastructure of tyranny in the USA and the other major western nations is fully in place, as they want a lockdown and state of crisis to make the propaganda work more effectively.
There will be a pre-emptive strike on Iran, I am sure, but it will be a stepping stone / precursor to a general world war, not the trigger event itself.
I would recommend this long but very detailed video which explains a fair amount of the rationale: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzjm9MJFSA8
Then you need to read "How The End Begins" by Ron Rosenbaum (2012).
There will be a pre-emptive strike on Iran, I am sure, but it will be a stepping stone / precursor to a general world war, not the trigger event itself.
I would recommend this long but very detailed video which explains a fair amount of the rationale: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzjm9MJFSA8
Then you need to read "How The End Begins" by Ron Rosenbaum (2012).
2 January 2013, 22:21
This I doubt very much,... so many people put things together and can come up with a whole load of different outcomes,... there are many videos showing conspiricy over things like 9/11,...
.......and an auther writes a book that he hopes he can sell,...a video is put together to entertain on youtube,...
If there is ever a ww111 then it will more likely be a cyber war
.......and an auther writes a book that he hopes he can sell,...a video is put together to entertain on youtube,...
If there is ever a ww111 then it will more likely be a cyber war
2 January 2013, 23:07
Highlander... with all due respect, please don't dismissively comment on serious subjects that have credible reference material without first reviewing said material.
3 January 2013, 00:00
(2 January 2013, 23:07)cryingfreeman Wrote: [ -> ]Highlander... with all due respect, please don't dismissively comment on serious subjects that have credible reference material without first reviewing said material.
I am not dismissing it,... if you read my post correctly I said `I doubt it`,.. thats an opinion,..please read response correctly
3 January 2013, 00:17
(2 January 2013, 21:59)cryingfreeman Wrote: [ -> ]The plan is for an eventual WW3 but not before all the infrastructure of tyranny in the USA and the other major western nations is fully in place, as they want a lockdown and state of crisis to make the propaganda work more effectively.Many thanks also for that excellent map of UK nuke targets that you posted a while back.
There will be a pre-emptive strike on Iran, I am sure, but it will be a stepping stone / precursor to a general world war, not the trigger event itself.
I would recommend this long but very detailed video which explains a fair amount of the rationale: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzjm9MJFSA8
Then you need to read "How The End Begins" by Ron Rosenbaum (2012).