Survival UK Forums

Full Version: Grenfell Tower Fire
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
I am shocked that high-rise multi-family residential buildings in UK aren't required to be fully sprinklered as they are in the US. Also amazed that outer building covering apparently contained combustible materials and was not "fire-stopped" between floors. The speed at which the fire spread through chimney effect is almost beyond belief.

I would expect this sort of tragedy in China or the former Soviet Union, but not UK.

Let's hope there is a thorough investigation and that fire codes are revised to modern standards and strictly enforced.

Prayers for the families.

Some links to US fire and building codes for these types of structures:

http://www.nfpa.org/public-education/by-...-buildings

http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build0...b04047.pdf

http://buildingcoderesourcelibrary.com/S...tance.aspx

http://www.nyc.gov/html/dob/downloads/pp...uction.pdf

http://www.jblearning.com/samples/076375...96-346.pdf

http://www2.iccsafe.org/states/Florida20...uction.pdf
Difficult at this point in time to give reasons for the rapid spread of the fire, but it does look like there was some shortchanging of safety materials used in the refurbishment of the building. They still haven't found out what caused the fire - do refrigerators "explode"? It all sounds a bit strange.
It will be a long term before the finger of guilt can be pointed at the cause of this very tragic event, they are all in my prayers.
Reading some of the related links on BBC I was shocked that propane is commonly used as refrigeration coolant over there and how many house fires are initiated by faulty household appliances. I can see this as a potential source for the fire, but the investigation must run its course.
I was up late last night and saw/herd the reports within a few minutes of the start of the fire.

I was also amazed at the rapid and complete spread of the flames. Within 10 minutes the building was completely engulfed, all around and from bottom to top.

Watching the live coverage I was astounded at the sight of people standing in the windows of burning flats talking on their cell phones, saying goodbye to loved ones. I saw several individuals jump from their flats to avoid the flames.

One reporter spoke with the manager of one of the emergency trauma centers they had established to deal with injuries. It was empty. The medic said that when that occurred either most escaped without injury or there were few survivors.

How does a concrete and steel building burn this intensely and completely?
I have read interviews with several of the fire fighters who claimed bodies impacted the ground all around them, including children landing on top of one of them, yet only 17 people have been confirmed dead at this point.

Are TPTB possibly twisting the numbers and treating these leaps and dropping children as suicides rather than fire deaths?
Any links to bodies impacting all around? My Google Fu must be weak as I can't find a reference.
As to why the fire spread so quickly:

http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/...so-quickly

Building safety - Grenfell Tower disaster: how did the fire spread so quickly?
By Feng Fu
Published 15 June 2017

In the middle of the night, while most residents were sleeping, a devastating fire started at Grenfell Tower in London. From an engineering perspective, there are a number of factors in the design of the 24-storey tower block that may have contributed to the speed and scale of the blaze. Most of the current guidelines across the world contain detailed design requirements for fire safety such as evacuation routes, compartmentation and structural fire design. But Grenfell Tower was built in 1974. At that time, the rules and regulations were not as clear and well-developed as they are now.

In the middle of the night, while most residents were sleeping, a devastating fire started at Grenfell Tower in London. The emergency response was rapid and robust: more than 200 firefighters attended the scene, with assistance arriving just six minutes after the first calls were made. Emergency services have confirmed that 12 people are dead. More remain missing and dozens are injured. Already, people are asking how the fire spread so rapidly and why it was so difficult for residents to escape.
Doubtless, in time, a thorough investigation will reveal the full details of what caused the disaster. But from an engineering perspective, there are a number of factors in the design of the 24-storey tower block that may have contributed to the speed and scale of the blaze.

Most of the current guidelines across the world contain detailed design requirements for fire safety such as evacuation routes, compartmentation and structural fire design. But Grenfell Tower was built in 1974. At that time, the rules and regulations were not as clear and well-developed as they are now.

Evacuation and compartmentation

The evacuation route is one of the most important design elements when it comes to fire safety. The route should allow occupants to escape the building as quickly as possible, while sheltering them from smoke and flames. Some tall buildings have staircases installed on the outside to prevent people from getting stuck in the corridors and provide access to fresh air while they escape. Other options include installing high-power fans inside buildings, to clear the evacuation route of smoke in the event of a fire. This feature is included in the design of Dubai’s Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world.

It’s clear that residents were not happy with the fire safety of the escape route from a blog posted in November 2016 and the design below would suggest there was only one set of stairs for evacuation. Investigators will need to determine what evacuation routes were available.

Another key strategy is to correctly design fire compartments to keep the fire from spreading quickly. This entails placing barriers in the building – such as fire-resistant doors and walls – to confine the fire to a local area, or at least slow the speed at which it can spread. These compartments are designed based on the function of the buildings by architects, so residential and commercial buildings will have different compartment design strategies.

In current design practice, some buildings even include special design measures for fires, such as refuge rooms for occupants in the higher storeys, who could have trouble escaping down stairs. There are also active fire protection methods such as using sprinklers. Though a parliamentary report following the 2009 Lakanal House fire in Camberwell, London, in which six people died, recommended that sprinkler systems be installed in tower blocks across the U.K., it’s not clear that these measured were implemented in Grenfell Tower. A local residents action group also claimed that their warnings about a lack of fire safety measures “fell on deaf ears”.

Materials matter

The fire risk level of any building also depends on its structural design – that is, the capacity of its materials to resist fire. Different materials receive different fire ratings in each design. For example, steel buildings are normally required to have structural elements such as beams or columns that can stand for one to two hours with the help of fire protection material such intumescent paint, which swells up when heated to protect the material beneath.

According to reports, the key structural components of Grenfell Tower are mostly made of concrete – a material which rates highly in terms of fire resistance. While other materials can buckle in high temperatures, concrete structures can help to prevent the collapse of a building in case of fire, as well as making it safer to use helicopters – which can dump up to 9,842 liters of water at a time – to extinguish the blaze.

There were also reports relating to cladding added as part of an £8.7m refurbishment in 2016. The material used for the cladding was primarily aluminium, which is not fire resistant. What’s more, aluminum has high conductivity – so the cladding itself could have heated up very quickly, failing to prevent the fire from travelling through the windows and up the exterior of the block from one story to another.

In truth, most old buildings do not conform to the latest guidelines for fire safety design, so it is imperative to update them by installing sprinklers, fire alarms and extra fire evacuation staircases. While those affected may have to wait for some time before the causes of the fire become clear and responsibility is taken, landlords and local councils can act now to help prevent another disaster of this scale from happening again.

Feng Fu is Lecturer in Structural Engineering, City, University of London.
This article is published courtesy of The Conversation (under Creative Commons-Attribution / No derivative).
As for people jumping from the building:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3794912/lo...test-news/

Trapped residents jumped from the burning building while others lashed bedsheets together in a desperate attempt to escape the flames

Desperate residents were seen flinging themselves from the building, jumping to their deaths as they tried to escape being burnt alive.

A baby was caught after being thrown from the ninth floor, while some frantic residents lashed bedsheets together in a crude attempt to escape the rapidly growing blaze.
The feedback seems to be that the building was safer before the upgrades although it wasn't perfect. The way it is being talked about is the SJWs who manage the tower block 'improved' its green status by installing plastic coated materials that burned replacing old style materials that didn't burn but were not green enough. Green materials that are fire resistant are more expensive so Green being the priority the fire retardation was secondary. More sacrifices to the Green God. Got to laugh.
Pages: 1 2