Survival UK Forums › News › News v
Sandy Hook Inconcistencies

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Sandy Hook Inconcistencies
16 January 2013, 17:05,
#11
BDG Offline
Member
 		Posts: 601
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 10
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies
(16 January 2013, 16:16)Skean Dhude Wrote: Shows how much attention I have been paying but the conspiracy concerns took the spotlight off the gun ban so it did its job.

Yeah, that is the stitch up part - the agencies responsible should have come out and said that they were not doing their jobs properly and Hamilton was not fit to hold a FAC - if things there had been no human failings in those agencies, the likely hood is that those kids would not be dead.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Tibbs735 - 10 January 2013, 20:18
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Straight Shooter - 10 January 2013, 22:24
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by ObongoPox - 11 January 2013, 00:02
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Destiny - 14 January 2013, 21:18
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by BDG - 14 January 2013, 21:27
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Tibbs735 - 14 January 2013, 23:27
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Skean Dhude - 14 January 2013, 23:53
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by BDG - 15 January 2013, 00:30
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Destiny - 15 January 2013, 22:50
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Skean Dhude - 16 January 2013, 16:16
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by BDG - 16 January 2013, 17:05
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by cryingfreeman - 16 January 2013, 17:08
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Metroyeti - 16 January 2013, 17:20

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)