(5 September 2012, 07:40)Prepaday Wrote: Girls who fall pregnant in their teens are little s luts?????? Those who get pregnant full stop...or those who get pregnant for a house?
Personally I think its fairer not to judge in a derogatory manner apart from a light weight humerous generalisation. It takes two to get prgenant and whilst some girls in loving arrrangements get unlucky, some are nowt but tarts
, but either way what happned to them happened. if they terminate, or keep the baby, if they adopt or give it to nana to raise thats totally their choice. Because after all who of us has not made some silly mistakes in our lives.
But what I am 100% adamant over is if they have that child it must be 100% THEIR responsibility and not anything to do with the state and tax payer. They should get no benefits, no free housing NOTHING, its their child and their responsibility so why should the rest of us tax payers struggling to raise our own children become even poorer to subsidise them. If people want kids so be it but its immoral and wrong to expect anyone else to pay anything towards their upkeep. If they cant feed em, dont breed em.
(5 September 2012, 07:40)Prepaday Wrote: Girls who fall pregnant in their teens are little s luts?????? Those who get pregnant full stop...or those who get pregnant for a house?
Does it matter ?, I dont think so cos its only a generalisation, if girls of any age decide to reproduce its 100% up to them, but equally it should be 100% up to them to pay all the costs involved.
I change mine every two years but i keep the old pairs as back ups as my eyes are not changing much.
Dunno how that last line about my specs ended up on this thread?????
Search
Calendar
Help
