Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ww3 in europe
29 January 2016, 16:03,
#1
ww3 in europe
top Swedish army chief warns of ww3 inside Europe in a few years

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/...be-at-war/

is he right to speak out like this

war with who
Survive the jive (youtube )
Reply
29 January 2016, 17:42,
#2
RE: ww3 in europe
isis, terrorists, Taliban, migrants.
all or any of the above.
Some people that prefer to be alone arent anti-social they just have no time for drama, stupidity and false people.
Reply
10 February 2016, 22:23,
#3
RE: ww3 in europe
Lord knows the mess we are all now in has been caused mostly by the inept and incompetent foreign policy of the US.
Anyone with half a brain on either side of the pond knows the truth, which is a scandal and an embarrassment. So, I hope that you might find some amusement and satisfaction to read that the manure is finally beginning to float...

If the moderators think this inappropriate, then please delete, but suffice to say we are disgusted with this clown in the WH as you are. The next election is going to be interesting...

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/...andal.html
Perhaps President Obama’s involvement is the reason that the FBI has not yet referred charges to the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case. It may be metastasizing so quickly and so dangerously that not only are agents and lawyers within the agency having trouble keeping up with new evidence of wrongdoing, but that the scandal itself now threatens a constitutional crisis...

FBI Director James Comey appears to long have had sufficient evidence to charge Clinton, but seemingly has so far been stayed by countervailing influences. On the one hand there are obvious political concerns and pressures. On the other is a continuing flow of evidence against Clinton that only makes the case against her stronger. But the Obama emails now complicate the case to an extraordinary degree. Does Comey have them, and if not, has he demanded them? If Obama refuses, then the President is effectively hiding probative evidence.

If Comey were to get the emails, and they did contain born classified information (as is likely) it would be difficult for Comey to proceed against Clinton without implicating Obama. Almost certainly, the Obama Justice Department would never pursue a prosecution that exposed him to criminal liability.

If Obama were a man who could actually admit a mistake, and also one that legitimately cared for his country, he would cut the Gordian Knot on this brewing crisis by releasing his email exchanges with Clinton -- redacted as necessary -- taking a mea culpa for being caught up in Hillary’s malfeasance, and throw her under the bus, which is something he does well...Obama might actually earn some credit for doing the right thing, and the Democrats would be rid of a problematic and probably unelectable candidate.

73 de KE4SKY
In
"Almost Heaven" West Virginia
USA
Reply
10 February 2016, 22:31,
#4
RE: ww3 in europe
Related news items for your disgust and amusement, take your pick:

http://reason.com/archives/2016/01/14/two-smoking-guns

http://observer.com/2016/02/breaking-hil...s-at-risk/

http://observer.com/2016/01/why-hillarys...e-matters/

http://observer.com/2016/01/hillarys-ema...s-nuclear/

http://observer.com/2015/10/hillarys-ema...from-over/

73 de KE4SKY
In
"Almost Heaven" West Virginia
USA
Reply
11 February 2016, 16:28,
#5
RE: ww3 in europe
From what i have seen Charles, we also have complete incapable idiots over here ....who are as clueless ,incompetent , bare faced lies .....it makes NO difference at ALL what party is in power....NOTHING changes....none deserve my vote or will get it next time around...all i see is corruption and manipulation everywhere i look....the game is up where i am concerned i have no belief left ....i am all out ! the only thing left ....is my OWN endevours .
Reply
12 February 2016, 23:40,
#6
RE: ww3 in europe
OPINION - Mounting Evidence Putin Will Ignite WWIII
By letting Putin get away with whatever he likes in Syria, Obama has created a deeply dangerous situation
By John R. Schindler • 02/11/16 10:51am
http://observer.com/2016/02/mounting-evi...ite-wwiii/

...By letting Mr. Putin get away with whatever he likes in Syria, Mr. Obama has created a deeply dangerous situation in the region. By abandoning his infamous Syria “redline” in September 2013, the White House in effect outsourced American policy there to Mr. Putin, as I warned at the time, and which the Obama administration, powerless to influence terrible events in Syria, is slowly realizing.

“Are we heading for our ‘Sarajevo moment’?” a senior NATO official bluntly asked. “It’s clear that there has to be some actual ‘redline’ for Mr. Obama, something that the United States cannot tolerate Russia doing—but where is it? If I don’t know, I’m sure the Kremlin doesn’t either.”

That is NATO’s top concern right now: After years of weakness and vacillation, the Obama administration may find itself backed into a corner by aggressive Russian action. Particularly if coupled with intemperate Turkish reactions, that could create a nightmare of historic proportions around Aleppo. Although the White House has foresworn any military intervention in Syria’s fratricide, it’s worth noting that Mr. Obama led NATO to war in Libya exactly five years ago to prevent possible slaughter in Benghazi, a far smaller humanitarian threat than the terrifying sword of Russian artillery and airpower that’s hanging over Aleppo right now.

For their part, the Russians are upping the ante with regime media publishing claims by the Defense Ministry that air attacks on Aleppo yesterday that killed civilians, including the bombing of a hospital, were actually perpetrated by U.S. Air Force A-10s, a war crime that they say the Pentagon has tried to pin on Moscow. In fact, American intelligence knows this was the work of the Russian Air Force: “We have intercepts of the Russian pilots talking during the attack,” a Pentagon official explained. “As usual, the Russians are lying.” Yet this sort of dishonest Kremlin propaganda, what spies term disinformation, is exactly what the Obama administration has refused to counter, as I’ve explained in this column, in a futile effort to keep the Kremlin happy.

Mr. Putin instead has taken his measure of Mr. Obama and has doubled down, saving his client regime in Syria. Russia has won in Syria, and NATO and the West are stuck with that outcome, as are the unlucky residents of Aleppo. “I hope Obama doesn’t decide to get a backbone now,” said a retired American general, who knows the Russians well, “since the Kremlin is in ‘drive’ in Syria and isn’t about to do ‘reverse.’”

There seems to be little chance of this White House taking on the Russians in Syria. However, there are no guarantees that Ankara is equally inclined to let the Kremlin do whatever it wants on its southern border, and that is how NATO could get embroiled in World War III over the Levant. Cooler heads may prevail, and all sensible people should hope they do here.

73 de KE4SKY
In
"Almost Heaven" West Virginia
USA
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)