+- Survival UK Forums (http://forum.survivaluk.net)
+-- Forum: News (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+--- Forum: News (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=90)
+--- Thread: It's a lose-lose situation. (/showthread.php?tid=1267)
Pages:
1
2
It's a lose-lose situation. - Scythe13 - 5 March 2012
This could go one of 2 ways.
If Mitt gets elected, you can almost guarantee war in Iran. However, you could also expect race riots in the US.
If Obama gets elected again, then America will not attack Iran. Instead Iran will get nuclear weapons and a big old war would kick off.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/international/romney-iran-will-obtain-a-nuclear-weapon-if-obama-is-re-elected-1.416578
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - NorthernRaider - 5 March 2012
Why should nation A B C and D who have nuclear weapons themselves object to nation E having them when nation E has not started any wars or invaded any other countries within the last 100 years, unlike nations A,B,C and D ?
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - TOF - 5 March 2012
(5 March 2012, 10:08)NorthernRaider Wrote: Why should nation A B C and D who have nuclear weapons themselves object to nation E having them when nation E has not started any wars or invaded any other countries within the last 100 years, unlike nations A,B,C and D ?
Couldn't put it better myself.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - Scythe13 - 5 March 2012
I think this is why:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-03-05/obama-cautions-against-talk-of-iran-war/3868798
Because they don't want it to.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - NorthernRaider - 5 March 2012
(5 March 2012, 10:38)Scythe13 Wrote: I think this is why:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-03-05/obama-cautions-against-talk-of-iran-war/3868798
Because they don't want it to.
Sir, the Americans will do what their Israeli masters TELL them to do.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - preservefreak - 5 March 2012
I'm not all that sure which of them gets in will change what laws get through. Unless one of them secretly has plans to really take the economy in hand I think the new president will need a big dangerous distraction.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - NorthernRaider - 5 March 2012
(5 March 2012, 11:57)preservefreak Wrote: I'm not all that sure which of them gets in will change what laws get through. Unless one of them secretly has plans to really take the economy in hand I think the new president will need a big dangerous distraction.
Such wisdom from such a young mind
the Merkins always like to find a new bogeyman to blame when their economy goes t*** up.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - Scythe13 - 5 March 2012
It seems NR, maybe you're wrong. Obama isn't bowing to Israel.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/after-aipac-speech-obama-s-meeting-with-netanyahu-is-almost-superfluous-1.416491
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - NorthernRaider - 5 March 2012
(5 March 2012, 12:20)Scythe13 Wrote: It seems NR, maybe you're wrong. Obama isn't bowing to Israel.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/after-aipac-speech-obama-s-meeting-with-netanyahu-is-almost-superfluous-1.416491
Then either he wont get relected and his remaining time in office he will be a lame duck president when the jewish lobby block all his plans, or they will bump him off.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - Scythe13 - 5 March 2012
(5 March 2012, 12:22)NorthernRaider Wrote:(5 March 2012, 12:20)Scythe13 Wrote: It seems NR, maybe you're wrong. Obama isn't bowing to Israel.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/after-aipac-speech-obama-s-meeting-with-netanyahu-is-almost-superfluous-1.416491
Then either he wont get relected and his remaining time in office he will be a lame duck president when the jewish lobby block all his plans, or they will bump him off.
You're a real NWO kind of guy hu? I'm more of an IRWM kind of person. Meaning, it really won't matter, we will still be screwed, regardless of who is in charge haha.