+- Survival UK Forums (http://forum.survivaluk.net)
+-- Forum: News (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+--- Forum: News (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=90)
+--- Thread: It's a lose-lose situation. (/showthread.php?tid=1267)
Pages:
1
2
It's a lose-lose situation. - Scythe13 - 5 March 2012
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - NorthernRaider - 5 March 2012
Why should nation A B C and D who have nuclear weapons themselves object to nation E having them when nation E has not started any wars or invaded any other countries within the last 100 years, unlike nations A,B,C and D ?
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - TOF - 5 March 2012
(5 March 2012, 10:08)NorthernRaider Wrote: Why should nation A B C and D who have nuclear weapons themselves object to nation E having them when nation E has not started any wars or invaded any other countries within the last 100 years, unlike nations A,B,C and D ?
Couldn't put it better myself.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - Scythe13 - 5 March 2012
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - NorthernRaider - 5 March 2012
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - preservefreak - 5 March 2012
I'm not all that sure which of them gets in will change what laws get through. Unless one of them secretly has plans to really take the economy in hand I think the new president will need a big dangerous distraction.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - NorthernRaider - 5 March 2012
(5 March 2012, 11:57)preservefreak Wrote: I'm not all that sure which of them gets in will change what laws get through. Unless one of them secretly has plans to really take the economy in hand I think the new president will need a big dangerous distraction.
Such wisdom from such a young mind
the Merkins always like to find a new bogeyman to blame when their economy goes t*** up.
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - Scythe13 - 5 March 2012
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - NorthernRaider - 5 March 2012
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - Scythe13 - 5 March 2012