![]() |
p2s prepping mag just found online - Printable Version +- Survival UK Forums (http://forum.survivaluk.net) +-- Forum: Discussion Area (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: An Open Box (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=78) +--- Thread: p2s prepping mag just found online (/showthread.php?tid=5736) Pages:
1
2
|
p2s prepping mag just found online - Prepper1 - 18 August 2013 http://pdfsdb.com/pdf/prepping-uk-1-97818549.html http://www.p2snetwork.co.uk/puk/feb2013.pdf Feb 2013 RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - Sunna - 18 August 2013 dont trust p2s dont trust dv RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - Skean Dhude - 18 August 2013 Did they do any more of this? RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - Highlander - 18 August 2013 (18 August 2013, 22:12)Skean Dhude Wrote: Did they do any more of this? I was wondering this myself, because someone put this link up ages ago RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - BFG Central - 18 August 2013 As far as im aware it was put on hold for a while? I think there were 3 or 4 issues on offer??? I dont think it was due to lack of interest. RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - bigpaul - 19 August 2013 i managed to get issue 1 and 2 printed off when it started, but since then nothing, seems to have died a death?? RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - Prepper1 - 19 August 2013 I thought I'd post the link as I hadn't seen it before on here, some decent stuff in it but the recipe bits were just so out of place... Hard work keeping a periodical going with fresh stuff , spect that's why its died... RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - bigpaul - 19 August 2013 there was a lot of upheavel on P2S, lots of people left, may have something to do with why it died. RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - Prepper1 - 19 August 2013 So we can safely assume it was all N.R.'s fault then!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Only joking N.R. ![]() ![]() RE: p2s prepping mag just found online - bigpaul - 19 August 2013 (19 August 2013, 14:24)Prepper1 Wrote: So we can safely assume it was all N.R.'s fault then!! for once, I don't think it had anything to do with NR! ![]() |