I think they should build it, it will have no impact above ground other than the creation of the shaft and head workings. If you understand what they are storing and how it is stored, it is not a problem at all.
i'd still keep away from there though, especially after TSHTF when there is no one to monitor it.
(30 January 2013, 13:49)BDG Wrote: [ -> ]I think they should build it, it will have no impact above ground other than the creation of the shaft and head workings. If you understand what they are storing and how it is stored, it is not a problem at all.
1sq KM of above ground facilities, access roads built and whatever else is required.
They're on about putting it in a NATIONAL PARK!
Regardless of what it is, the nuclear thing doesn't bother me at all, it's the location. One of the few unspoilt places the UK has left.
i dont like nuclear, i dont trust nuclear and i wont live near nuclear, thats why we left Somerset.
(30 January 2013, 13:58)bigpaul Wrote: [ -> ]i dont like nuclear, i dont trust nuclear and i wont live near nuclear, thats why we left Somerset.
why what in somerset?
Why don't they put it in london's abandoned stations... oh hang on that's too close to them, that's why they want it up there, far far away in case of accidents...
near the plebs...
Oh wait haven't they just given the go ahead for fracking in the u.k. again, that can cause geological faults to open....
(30 January 2013, 14:01)Barneyboy Wrote: [ -> ] (30 January 2013, 13:58)bigpaul Wrote: [ -> ]i dont like nuclear, i dont trust nuclear and i wont live near nuclear, thats why we left Somerset.
why what in somerset?
HINCKLEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER STATION EDF are currently setting out the ground works for Hinckey C.
Thats all you have to think about...
If its that safe, why not bury it in Hyde park???
Or nearer parliament....
were running out of space dudes!!!