+- Survival UK Forums (http://forum.survivaluk.net)
+-- Forum: News (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+--- Forum: News (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=90)
+--- Thread: conpire this (/showthread.php?tid=3448)
RE: conpire this - Barneyboy - 26 November 2012
(26 November 2012, 14:06)Scythe13 Wrote: Considering the CIA trained Al-Q during the Gulf War (not a conspiracy theory. This is actual documented truth) it does pose an issue for me suggesting that Al-Q never existed.
Any links worth watching?
NO
RE: conpire this - Scythe13 - 26 November 2012
RE: conpire this - TheFalcon - 26 November 2012
RE: conpire this - Scythe13 - 26 November 2012
Well done TF for having a good level headed view.
I'm not trying to discredit ANYTHING people say. Whether aliens, illuminati, zioniest, reptilians, naribu, planet-x or anything like that, we are all entitled to believe what we want. I support that, and whether people like it or not, we're allowed to think what we want.
However, I do ask that people look at things with a certain level of scepticism and a whole load of logic.
Some of the stuff that comes up is very interesting and some is entertaining. No doubt, some of it could well be the truth. But instead of posting that every story from an alternative source is true, why not post and ask people's views and the alike? For this, I'm not sure it effects how we prep.
If Al-Q isn't real, I'm still going to prep for a cold winter. If Al-Q is real, then I'm still going to prep for a cold winter.
Interesting stuff to play around with, but it seems so painfully flimsy this time. To me, this is nothing more than entertainment.
Also, many thanks to TheFalcon for posting links. Stories shouldn't be posted without a link; so good work TF for putting links in to back up what you say.
A story isn't really 'news' (controversial or not) without a link to a reputable source. NR is notorious for this, but then posts a link when questioned. On the other hand BP just posts from the DailyFail which doesn't count as a reputable source haha.
RE: conpire this - Straight Shooter - 26 November 2012
yes there,s loads of stuff to look at and you have to traul your way through alot to gain a view FOR YOURSELF..but you got to look through piles of stuff, when you leave a link,thats all it is a link...to be shot down later...its only a perception of what you think is right as YOU see things this does not mean YOUR view is the correct one ....so you have to do the work yourself and go through the lot...if you think its worth the effort ...or if you think its rubbish...don,t waste your time...there is no shortcut to truth
RE: conpire this - TheFalcon - 26 November 2012
yep i agree with you i cant say what is certain and what is not its always good to have a natter though
RE: conpire this - Wildman - 26 November 2012
Sorry peeps, the point I was trying to make was based on the two videos (mainly wikki) is the proof is there in wikki that with out any doubt. The worlds powers tb are not to be trusted. Wikki has printed more truths than a certain u.s news paper has printed anything since it started. Its one thing reading conspiracys, but it's another thing having the world send real proof that a lot of conspiracys are infact true. The news papers know everything but are only allowed to write what their allowed to write. Washington are not denying any of the leaks, there actually screaming that it's not right that the truth should be revealed. The CIA and al Qaeda was a pointer to take into consideration bassed on the thousands and thousands of corrupt lies, war crimes, and murders wikki has leaked. And as always keep your views and don't try and change them, less you feel you should.
RE: conpire this - Scythe13 - 26 November 2012
(26 November 2012, 18:34)Straight Shooter Wrote: yes there,s loads of stuff to look at and you have to traul your way through alot to gain a view FOR YOURSELF..but you got to look through piles of stuff, when you leave a link,thats all it is a link...to be shot down later...its only a perception of what you think is right as YOU see things this does not mean YOUR view is the correct one ....so you have to do the work yourself and go through the lot...if you think its worth the effort ...or if you think its rubbish...don,t waste your time...there is no shortcut to truth
I totally agree with what you're saying.
This forum has so many people with pretty vast view points, that's one of the reasons I ask for a link. It would take me MANY HOURS to get to something worth watching....which wouldn't be something I've got time to do. If however another member of the forum finds something credible and noteworthy, then it saves LOADS of time when they add a link, instead of having to trawl for hours yourself.
(26 November 2012, 20:15)Wildman Wrote: Sorry peeps, the point I was trying to make was based on the two videos (mainly wikki) is the proof is there in wikki that with out any doubt. The worlds powers tb are not to be trusted. Wikki has printed more truths than a certain u.s news paper has printed anything since it started. Its one thing reading conspiracys, but it's another thing having the world send real proof that a lot of conspiracys are infact true. The news papers know everything but are only allowed to write what their allowed to write. Washington are not denying any of the leaks, there actually screaming that it's not right that the truth should be revealed. The CIA and al Qaeda was a pointer to take into consideration bassed on the thousands and thousands of corrupt lies, war crimes, and murders wikki has leaked. And as always keep your views and don't try and change them, less you feel you should.
I have no doubt TPTB wouldn't release information to us. Which is why the media and news companies are (supposedly) separate from the government. I did a big rant post about this on one of NR's threads. I think it was called "Would they tell us?" The overwhelming answer was 'no, they wouldn't tell us.'
As for dealing with posting this stuff online about corruption etc....I'm genuinely concerned about whether it would be safe to tell exactly what I believe.
RE: conpire this - Straight Shooter - 26 November 2012
i get it and you wildman...others will given time
RE: conpire this - Cloud - 3 December 2012
I try to judge the information being presented rather than the person presenting it, and even if you ignore people like alex jones and david icke (of which i follow both) the amount of information available to prove how many times goverments have lied, and are not working in the interest of the public is blaringly obvious to anybody with two brain cells and a couple of hours to sit down and actually look at the info imo.
However thats the problem these days, most people just cant take the small amount fo time to sit down and look at the info, or when they do they seem to loose all ability to logicaly asses the evidence, and then fly into a fitfull rage of denial.