+- Survival UK Forums (http://forum.survivaluk.net)
+-- Forum: News (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+--- Forum: News (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=90)
+--- Thread: More proof benefits are to extravagent (/showthread.php?tid=3471)
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - Pagan-Mist - 27 November 2012
I think a lot of it is how a dog is treated. Dogs such as these have been bred for the for the sole purpose of fighting its in their blood these types of dogs should be completely outlawed or owners should be made to pay several hundred pounds for licences when stopped by the police no production of a licence they go straight to the pound and put down with a court order demanding these stupid idiots pay all costs. Doubt it would work before someones screaming about their human rights being breached but what the hell they'd proberly win. What about the childs right to be safe
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - Metroyeti - 27 November 2012
People dont train and socilize there dogs wich is also a problem
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - Pagan-Mist - 27 November 2012
I think its down to breeding. I grew up with labs, alsations, lurchers and jack russell terriers, these were all working dogs only the labs socialised when out on the field working, the rest never the only time I was bit was by an alsation we hadn't had for long my father took it out and put it down, no messing around although it was a guard dog it was supposed to protect not attack us. My father latter found out it was inbred. I don't like pitt bull types after reading that with very good reason.
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - NorthernRaider - 27 November 2012
(27 November 2012, 17:50)Metroyeti Wrote: People dont train and socilize there dogs wich is also a problem
or their effin kids
(27 November 2012, 18:03)Pagan-Mist Wrote: I think its down to breeding. I grew up with labs, alsations, lurchers and jack russell terriers,
Yup I've had similar problems training Chavs, Pikeys, Druggies, Dole Wallas, they breed like mad but the quality of the stock is crap.
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - bigpaul - 27 November 2012
never let the facts (1 brat, 2 dogs) get in the way of a good rant.
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - In the Dark - 27 November 2012
£3k to keep the dogs alive till the trial FFS
they should have been destroyed immediately after the attackRE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - BDG - 27 November 2012
(27 November 2012, 15:27)Prepper1 Wrote: If there anything like the chavs around here, what they do is first steal the male and female dogs, keep them in absolutely squalid conditions, breed the living shi* out of them the throw them out after years of selling the pups on places like gumtree etc... pedigree pups papers or not, or fighting dogs equals big money, easy money.
They're usually the dogs you see turning up at dog homes starving.
AND the bulk dry food they feed them is cheap enough, cheaper if you rob it from the warehouse...or the delivery van.
Nothing to do with benefits.
And yes BDG it is true, I have former aquaintances that do it.
Do you want their names and addresses?????
For your proof files....
I'm sure you've all seen reports of break ins at kennels etc stud farms for dogs etc....
Now you know why.
Dogs are also traded against weed debts etc... chav lifes are very different than most of yours....
Or swapped for a xbox etc...
Motocross bikes are a good swap for a good dog apparently.
WTF?
You are trying to discredit something I did not say in a topic I have not posted in up until now?
You have it bad sweety.
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - Barneyboy - 28 November 2012
(27 November 2012, 22:31)BDG Wrote:(27 November 2012, 15:27)Prepper1 Wrote: If there anything like the chavs around here, what they do is first steal the male and female dogs, keep them in absolutely squalid conditions, breed the living shi* out of them the throw them out after years of selling the pups on places like gumtree etc... pedigree pups papers or not, or fighting dogs equals big money, easy money.
They're usually the dogs you see turning up at dog homes starving.
AND the bulk dry food they feed them is cheap enough, cheaper if you rob it from the warehouse...or the delivery van.
Nothing to do with benefits.
And yes BDG it is true, I have former aquaintances that do it.
Do you want their names and addresses?????
For your proof files....
I'm sure you've all seen reports of break ins at kennels etc stud farms for dogs etc....
Now you know why.
Dogs are also traded against weed debts etc... chav lifes are very different than most of yours....
Or swapped for a xbox etc...
Motocross bikes are a good swap for a good dog apparently.
WTF?
You are trying to discredit something I did not say in a topic I have not posted in up until now?
You have it bad sweety.
no we just no your a knob
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - NorthernRaider - 28 November 2012
Guys, slagging off political parties and politics in general is fair game , but attacking people individually is not, please refrain from serious personal slurs, if you piss off SD you wont like the end result, so please by all means whinge about the inadequacies of our government system but stop the personal attacks we just dont need it.
RE: More proof benefits are to extravagent - BDG - 28 November 2012
(28 November 2012, 09:56)Barneyboy Wrote: no we just no your a knob
LOL.
Your is a possessive adjective, indicating ownership of something. You're is a contraction of you and are. Here are some examples:
Your written English leaves a lot to be desired.
You're terrible at spelling.
Now, back to the OP. Is it just me, but if you were up in crown court would you not try to dress in what is referred to as business attire?