![]() |
The Enfield That Never Was - Printable Version +- Survival UK Forums (http://forum.survivaluk.net) +-- Forum: Discussion Area (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Forum: Hunting (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +---- Forum: Guns (http://forum.survivaluk.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=28) +---- Thread: The Enfield That Never Was (/showthread.php?tid=6417) Pages:
1
2
|
The Enfield That Never Was - Mortblanc - 26 December 2013 Made in my own shop with my own little hands. 16" barrel, muzzle brake, LER scope. ![]() ![]() RE: The Enfield That Never Was - Scythe13 - 26 December 2013 Pretty!!! Have you tried it out? Would be good to get some info on how you made it too mate. That would be cool. RE: The Enfield That Never Was - Midnitemo - 26 December 2013 Looks good, sort of jeff cooper scout rifle crossed with a no5 jungle carbine RE: The Enfield That Never Was - Midnitemo - 26 December 2013 i always wanted a no5 but wouldn't pay £500 for a good one so i bought a mosin carbine for £100....fun to shoot and the built in pig sticker was interesting but by god it kicked like a mule on steroids...still like a no5 even now. CZ do a rifle of the shelf in a very similar style spec called a "527" for about £600 be good in the 7.62x39 calibre with a small fixed magnification scope on top + a few spare steel mags like this RE: The Enfield That Never Was - NorthernRaider - 26 December 2013 Used a friends Enfield jungle carbine back in the 70s , kicked like a mule, noisy as hell and really did not like changable temperatures outdoors, point of aim was all over depending on how hot or cold it was,. RE: The Enfield That Never Was - Midnitemo - 26 December 2013 yeah there not noted for there accuracy but i still like em...more as a curio than a shooter...the mosin carbine had all the same faults, deafeningly loud a muzzle flash more in keeping with a flamethrower and a really sadistic recoil incorporating a steel squared off butt plate!!!!....but i always had a queue of people wanting to fire it down the range(nobody ever came back for seconds though!) RE: The Enfield That Never Was - NorthernRaider - 26 December 2013 Flamethrower ![]() ![]() ![]() RE: The Enfield That Never Was - Mortblanc - 26 December 2013 We have Mosins too. I do like the concept of the "scout rifle" and have several firearms that use parts of that philosophy. They usually differ from the Cooper Concept a some way bot follow that train of thought to one degree or another. ![]() The Mosins are generally more accurate than Enfields from the start. More forgiving, cheaper and easier to work with. My work with the Enfields has always rendered less than I desired or expected. Everything about their design detracts from the accuracy potential; two piece stock, barrel bands with pressure going every which way, bores damaged by long use with corrosive powders and primers. The Enfield above is 3 years short of its 100th birthday, being from the middle of war time production. WW1 that is. The date stamp is 1917. I purchased it many years ago for $35 U.S. at a "boot sale". It will keep its shots on a dust bin lid @ 100m but just barely, as opposed to the Mosin, which will shoot inside a teacup at the same range. As for explaining the build, that would take volumes. I did picture document the cutting and re-crowning of the MN barrel, which is easy enough if someone needs that information. RE: The Enfield That Never Was - Stevew - 28 December 2013 i love enfields but not in plastic clothes!!! whats wrong with wood!! ![]() RE: The Enfield That Never Was - Steve - 28 December 2013 We need to find some WW2 Italian rifles, they will be mint ![]() |