Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sandy Hook Inconcistencies
16 January 2013, 17:05,
#11
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies
(16 January 2013, 16:16)Skean Dhude Wrote: Shows how much attention I have been paying but the conspiracy concerns took the spotlight off the gun ban so it did its job.

Yeah, that is the stitch up part - the agencies responsible should have come out and said that they were not doing their jobs properly and Hamilton was not fit to hold a FAC - if things there had been no human failings in those agencies, the likely hood is that those kids would not be dead.
Reply
16 January 2013, 17:08,
#12
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies
Re the Batman Sandy Hook reference - and all the other laughably obvious staged interviews, etc. - one would have to surmise that these things are done specifically so that the switched-on people out there notice it and start commenting about it on the web. It means the powers that be who orchestrate false flags can instantly identify who the dissenters / possible future upstarts-cum-insurgents-cum thought criminals will be. Which means the lock-down and roundup can’t be too far off, perhaps. That certainly ties in with the flurry of preparations being made by the USG and other governments around the world.
Reply
16 January 2013, 17:20,
#13
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies
Not read/watched the links so no comment on them.

if they did ban guns what would be the point? We all know how well making drugs ilegal has worked
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)