Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What comes first – a Syrian chemical attack or a US-led military showdown?
#1
I tried to be normal once.... Worst two minutes of my life...
Reply
#2
Does not matter P1....its coming down no matter what
Reply
#3
Should NATO ground troops and aircraft go in and the whole thing escalates,just wondering whether it's likely to remain confined to that region.It's quite good fun when it's on TV and 3000,or so,miles away.
Suburban neighbours= stranger- danger.
Reply
#4
looks like its going to kick off soon don't think that's in doubt my question is how bad is it going to be ? how far reaching will it be, could it cause us problems now or further down the line ?
Reply
#5
Be really exciting if Israel comes under bio-chemical and/or nuclear attack,but ONLY if there are no repercussions for us.
Suburban neighbours= stranger- danger.
Reply
#6
The thing as soon as we get involved there is always reprecussions for us in one way or another
A major part of survival is invisibility.
Reply
#7
he never planned to fail, he just failed to plan. like lambs to the slaughter the wolfs look down from the hill tops. we are those wolfs!!!
Reply
#8
Find a resilient place and way to live, then sit back and watch a momentous period in history unfold.
Reply
#9
he never planned to fail, he just failed to plan. like lambs to the slaughter the wolfs look down from the hill tops. we are those wolfs!!!
Reply
#10
sounds a lot like just before we went into iraq for the second time, we where told they had weapons of mass destruction and found nothing ! intel sucks
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)