|
cheap labour??
|
12 June 2012, 06:34
I should think it's hardly 'cheap labour' if you totalled all their benefits! I approve of schemes like this! They should have been more prepared shouldn't they! I can't see that a few hours under a bridge is going to kill anyone ... oh but ... here we go ... the 'c' worrd's being bandied about! How about compensating the long suffering tax payer who foots the bill for all this nonsense? Pah!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
cheap labour?? - by bigpaul - 6 June 2012, 11:25
RE: cheap labour?? - by Skean Dhude - 6 June 2012, 12:41
RE: cheap labour?? - by Tonka - 12 June 2012, 01:50
RE: cheap labour?? - by Skean Dhude - 12 June 2012, 19:11
RE: cheap labour?? - by grumpy old man - 6 June 2012, 18:13
RE: cheap labour?? - by Bug_out_Bag - 12 June 2012, 06:34
RE: cheap labour?? - by bigpaul - 12 June 2012, 15:22
RE: cheap labour?? - by Pagan-Mist - 12 June 2012, 17:29
RE: cheap labour?? - by Barneyboy - 12 June 2012, 17:52
RE: cheap labour?? - by Pagan-Mist - 12 June 2012, 18:59
RE: cheap labour?? - by bigpaul - 12 June 2012, 19:19
RE: cheap labour?? - by Reg - 12 June 2012, 20:12
RE: cheap labour?? - by Tonka - 12 June 2012, 23:32
RE: cheap labour?? - by Skean Dhude - 13 June 2012, 07:40
RE: cheap labour?? - by Stalker-01 - 16 June 2012, 07:33
RE: cheap labour?? - by bigpaul - 16 June 2012, 10:37
RE: cheap labour?? - by Prep28 - 21 June 2012, 23:01
RE: cheap labour?? - by James Jackson - 22 June 2012, 08:54
|
Search
Calendar
Help
