Survival UK Forums › News › News v
Sandy Hook Inconcistencies

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Sandy Hook Inconcistencies
15 January 2013, 00:30,
#8
BDG Offline
Member
 		Posts: 601
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 10
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies
The records were opened in 2005 - it is thought they were sealed so poor inter-agency working was not made public and so that the many 'unofficial' approaches to the authorities about Hamilton would not come to light and make TPTB seem incompetent for not looking at them as a whole.

http://thescum.info/category/dunblane/
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Tibbs735 - 10 January 2013, 20:18
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Straight Shooter - 10 January 2013, 22:24
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by ObongoPox - 11 January 2013, 00:02
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Destiny - 14 January 2013, 21:18
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by BDG - 14 January 2013, 21:27
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Tibbs735 - 14 January 2013, 23:27
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Skean Dhude - 14 January 2013, 23:53
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by BDG - 15 January 2013, 00:30
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Destiny - 15 January 2013, 22:50
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Skean Dhude - 16 January 2013, 16:16
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by BDG - 16 January 2013, 17:05
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by cryingfreeman - 16 January 2013, 17:08
RE: Sandy Hook Inconcistencies - by Metroyeti - 16 January 2013, 17:20

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)