Great find NR. It's spot on true!
Love the quote SD, but I'd love to focus on the other main thing you said.
(19 January 2012, 11:10)Skean Dhude Wrote: Whilst in the US crime has been coming down in the areas where people can freely buy guns. I wonder if there is some conclusion we can draw from that?
As NR said, we expect te government to protect us and all the rest. That is called a protectionist mindest. The problem is, that our law system does not allow us to protect ourselves. We have negated the right to self protection in favour of outsourcing the protection role to a government that has proved, time and time again, not to be able to protect us.
I think we should cut off the protectionist views and we should be legally allowed to protect ourselves.
(19 January 2012, 11:31)NorthernRaider Wrote: I pissed myself laughing at an article I read last year, It was about a neighbourhood watch meeting that was organised for 7pm one night in one of those wonderful, diverse, inclusive multi cultural socialist paradise London boroughs. The cops turned up and a councillor turned up but no residents, When enquiries were made in this beacon example of a cohesive multi cultural community as to why no one turned it it transpired no decent law abidding citizen dared to venture out after dark!!!.
And I loved the reply to a question on a radio talk show about what was the difference between the 1980s Tottenham riots and the riots last August after millions of pounds had been spent and thousands of hours of police and council workers time invested in improving Tottenham. First guy comes on the phone and say " I'll tell you what is different, more crime, more violence, more ethnics, more damage and far less cops around"
And NR has just reconfirmed my previous statement.
We, the people, should be allowed to arm ourselves for personal protection.
Search
Calendar
Help
