AAAAAAAAaaaaarrgh you lot are doing it again, ending up arguing with friends about causal issues of which NONE OF YOU has any control over, instead of talking about the best ways of reacting to issues and threats.
It doesnt bloody matter IF the government MAY be able to come hunting stockpiles and caches, It MAY not be OUR government that decides to sieze your stuff it MAY not, it could be the EU, It could be the yanks it could be the pixies living at the bottom of BPs garden.
YOU identify to yourselves what YOU consider to be a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER and you then plan on how best to mitigate that danger. You dont get into ass kicking contests over wether a scenario is real or not, likely or not to happen. You identify a possible threat and then find ways to ensure it doesnt happen to you.
Guys in 35 years of survivalism and prepping you lot are by far the most inteligent and inspirational people I have met, but you keep slipping into disputes abnout wether a threat is likely or not, high risk or low risk, IT DOESNT BLOODY MATTER your efforts must be on REACTING in a propper manner as to how YOU will prep to deal with the threat is you see fit.
If A believes the New Zealand army are aliens planning on invading the UK and mating with the sheep its not wether its right or wrong its how you react to a newly defined threat.
NR ( now with added migraine)
(3 October 2012, 21:26)Scythe13 Wrote: The idea of the government going door to door does seem pretty nuts. Much more realistic that your neighbours will come knocking.
As an interesting thought, why not knock on their door first to get them thinking you have nothing?
And why not just go " Hey XXXX has identified a possible threat to us from the gummint coming to steal our stuff, I may not think its likely or feasable but its something we should discuss and possibly develop plans to deal with it SHOULD it happen".
Search
Calendar
Help
