19 December 2013, 14:28
How long do I cut the limbs for PMR 446?
|
19 December 2013, 14:54
(This post was last modified: 19 December 2013, 15:04 by Lightspeed.)
72 de
Lightspeed 26-SUKer-17 26-TM-580 STATUS: Bugged-In at the Bug-Out
19 December 2013, 21:36
(This post was last modified: 19 December 2013, 21:41 by CharlesHarris.)
At UHF frequencies, the type of coaxial cable used, and the type of connectors used make a big difference. The so-called "UHF" connectors PL259 male, and SO239 female, are not constant impedence above about 150 Mhz, and result in significant losses. Also, the common RG8 foam coax typically used for CB radio, has excessive line losses for UHF. I'm not sure which cables are available yo you in UK, but in the US we run Times Microwave LMR400 cable for anything above 150MHz or the equivalent Belden 9913, and would prefer to run only N-type connectors, if possible. On modern UHF portable transceivers the SMA type connectors also work well.
If your antenna is in your loft, the presence of any metal within about a wavelength of the antenna can cause coupling which affects its resonant frequency and disrupts the radiation pattern of the antenna. If you can find a local radio amateur with both SWR and a field strength meter, it may be helpful to do some trouble shooting. The US amateur 70cm band includes your 446 MHz portion. It is commonly used here for FM simplex and repeater operation. It shouldn't be difficult to find a US-band 70cm antenna which is resonant on your PMR frequencies. Most commercially made antennas will have a gamma-match stub to allow specific tuning for best SWR on your working frequency, but also have sufficient band width to not exceed a 2:1 VWSR over the 5 MHz repeater splits used on the US FM phone band. An end-mounted 4-element yagi with a boom length of 1 wavelength should provide about 8dB of forward gain if properly set up. 73 de KE4SKY In "Almost Heaven" West Virginia USA
19 December 2013, 23:10
Charles, thanks very much for taking the time to draft this in depth reply, I got to be honest and admit I undersood about 1% of it, I'm a technophobe as LS will testify
![]()
20 December 2013, 02:10
Sounds like NR Jr is trying to reach you from the village itself, and is transmitting with buildings blocking line of sight to you. The trucks you can hear 3 miles away are probably in a clearer line of sight to you?
What Charles is saying is that using wrong connectors and coax cable at 446Mhz will absorb a lot of signal, both on transmit and receive. He's right and I didn't pick up on this. The dipole centre you have purchased has the wrong type of coax connector and is suitable only for frequencies up to approximately 144 Mhz. How long is the coax between your transmitter and your antenna?
72 de
Lightspeed 26-SUKer-17 26-TM-580 STATUS: Bugged-In at the Bug-Out
20 December 2013, 09:53
(This post was last modified: 20 December 2013, 09:54 by NorthernRaider.)
The 160mm Dellboy DIY Dipole coax is 10 meters long its RG58U 50ohm using a pl259 to SMA male adaptor to connect it to the Baofeng.
I'm on a hilltop BTW and NR junior was at the bottom of the hill, buildings are in the way.
20 December 2013, 11:25
(This post was last modified: 20 December 2013, 11:31 by NorthernRaider.)
(20 December 2013, 11:05)Lightspeed Wrote: Your 10m of RG58 and the connectors are probably eating around 30% of your signal. Bugger, I may be able to do some major cable rerouting and get it down to say 5 meters would that cut the loss of signal by half? Would more elivation on the ant overcome the problems broadcasting south co thats the direction I need to transmit most as NR junior and Mrs NR work or school that direction??. Starting to think i need a burner and a much higher antenna to reach the places I need to reach. BTW theres little or no metal in my loft to interfere cept the neighbouring CB ant sat on a 2 ft square sheet of metal earth plane, would moving the PMR ant outside gain much?? Ideally I really would like to keep the antennas in the loft for Opsec and MTCE issues.
20 December 2013, 11:44
(This post was last modified: 20 December 2013, 11:50 by Lightspeed.)
Yes, halving the coax length will half the losses from it, but not the insertion losses of the connectors.
Getting the antenna higher and in the open is always a good idea, and for sure will improve things a good deal. This antenna has good reviews. It appears to be tuned specifically to PMR446 band, so may be worthwhile considering. I have not played with one myself, so only have web reviews to go on. Re burners: don't forget that your signal is being attenuated both ways. If you install an amplifier, then you'll need to install a receive pre-amplifier as well. Make sure that both are tuned to 446 Mhz Personally I'd forget about amplifiers and pre-amps and concentrate on getting a well tuned antenna high and in the clear. I'd feed this with as short a run as possible using the best coax I could afford. Connectors should ideally be N-Type.
72 de
Lightspeed 26-SUKer-17 26-TM-580 STATUS: Bugged-In at the Bug-Out |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)