Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r)
25 January 2018, 17:27,
#29
RE: CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r)
I've used CB portables and their big limitation is the antenna, because at 27 MHz the wavelength is so long that even if you have a long, unwieldly whip, the base-loaded, short for its wavelength antenna is a very inefficient radiator and the range of such units is very short. A 2-metre or 70cm band portable can use a full-sized telescoping half-wavelength whip which is an effective radiator, especially if a 1/4 wavelength counterpoise wire is attached to the shield of the antenna connector, to keep the rf from coupling with your body.

73 de KE4SKY
In
"Almost Heaven" West Virginia
USA
Reply


Messages In This Thread
CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r) - by Lightspeed - 10 March 2016, 17:26
RE: CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r) - by Easy rider - 21 January 2018, 15:23
RE: CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r) - by Lightspeed - 25 January 2018, 06:21
RE: CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r) - by CharlesHarris - 25 January 2018, 17:27
RE: CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r) - by Easy rider - 25 January 2018, 23:03
RE: CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r) - by Lightspeed - 29 January 2018, 22:07
RE: CB vs Dual-Band Hand held (UV5r) - by SteveG4wwk - 22 February 2018, 23:23

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)