Search
Calendar
Help
21 November 2023, 21:26
So what is the answer? should we scrap it and go down the private healthcare route where people have to pay a fortune to a company only to find that our treatment ends because we have run out of cover?
Or
Should we properly fund the NHS.
For me it's the latter, we need a full overhaul of the NHS, to me we have far too many administrators, I think we could cut hospital management and divert the money into providing more Doctors and Nurses, we should also look at outsourcing, we have private companies operating CT Clinics, we have private ambulance companies transporting patients to hospital, Our Blood Transfusion service was outsourced years ago, that's just 3, all of these private companies have paid CEO's, they have shareholders, the savings by bringing these back under the NHS control would be enormous, in my opinion if the NHS is to remain it needs to be ran the way a private business would be run but fully under the control of a competent Government, cut out the penpushers, and bring back Matrons. and everyone needs to pay for it.
Or
Should we properly fund the NHS.
For me it's the latter, we need a full overhaul of the NHS, to me we have far too many administrators, I think we could cut hospital management and divert the money into providing more Doctors and Nurses, we should also look at outsourcing, we have private companies operating CT Clinics, we have private ambulance companies transporting patients to hospital, Our Blood Transfusion service was outsourced years ago, that's just 3, all of these private companies have paid CEO's, they have shareholders, the savings by bringing these back under the NHS control would be enormous, in my opinion if the NHS is to remain it needs to be ran the way a private business would be run but fully under the control of a competent Government, cut out the penpushers, and bring back Matrons. and everyone needs to pay for it.