23 June 2012, 00:43
i think my point is still valid, a gun is better then the bow, the bows better then the knife....
but if you cannot get the gun, get a bow, and if you cannot get the bow get a knife. After all having something is better then nothing, and if we lose a large portion of the population thier is a chance of finding things such as guns, bows, knifes. or even making basic balistic weapons out of tubes and strings, afrer all the ira ect ect did things like that
but if you cannot get the gun, get a bow, and if you cannot get the bow get a knife. After all having something is better then nothing, and if we lose a large portion of the population thier is a chance of finding things such as guns, bows, knifes. or even making basic balistic weapons out of tubes and strings, afrer all the ira ect ect did things like that