Survivor dilemma

[Lightspeed]

(3 December 2012, 22:55)The Local Ned Wrote: I always try and compare what COULD happen here with what DID happen in the early pioneering years of the states.

The early settlers didn't know if the wagon and riders heading their way meant good or ill - one of the reasons the Americans love their firearms so much - its instilled by a long tradition of self-defence.

One bucket of water for a seemingly innocent traveller sometimes led to rape and murder , the more remote farming communities were preyed upon by roving bands of bandits etc.

There was no law to stem the violence.

I'm not saying this will definitely happen here , but I expect that as time goes on and supplies dwindle - those who are less prepared will start getting notions of attacking those of us who are.

Even lovey-dovey communes wont escape that , being nice to people will not make them automatically respect you , no matter how much medicines/food/supplies you have.

Those who are intelligent enough to survive and struggle through those early days (because of their preparations and plans) will be far more of a threat to any of you than the sheeple who will be dying off in their millions.

Unless you have previous contact with the individual(s) concerned ,I'd stay clear unless it is unavoidable.

Good points TLN

I agree with you entirely, and especially about survivors after initial die out being a threat.