17 June 2013, 15:16
(This post was last modified: 17 June 2013, 15:17 by Grumpy Grandpa.)
(17 June 2013, 15:10)bigpaul Wrote:(17 June 2013, 15:08)Grumpy Grandpa Wrote:(17 June 2013, 15:04)bigpaul Wrote:(17 June 2013, 15:01)Scythe13 Wrote:personally I just wouldn't bother, like I said I wont be bartering or trading. the sooner all the druggies die off from their withdrawal symptoms or just having accidents as they "come down" the better, good riddance I say.(17 June 2013, 15:00)bigpaul Wrote: i'd like to destroy all the (illegal) drugs I found, drugs only cause problems.
Or profit if you're the dealer haha.
But the poor wee lambs are just victims BP!
yeah "self inflicted" ones....I've got no sympathy for them....they'll be the first ones to go.
I remember hearing a Sheriff answer a solicitor who was trying to portray his client as a victim of drugs - "If he's a junkie, say he's a junkie. He's getting no sympathy in my court!" Brought a round of applause, that one...
(17 June 2013, 14:43)Sunna Wrote: IN MANY MOVIES/SENARIOS A MAJOR DIEOFF OF THE POPULATION SEEMS ACCEPTED .
SO YOU POP DOWN TO YOUR LOCAL TESCO AND START HELPING YOURSELF TO A WELL THOUGHT OUT SHOPPING LIST THEN YOU HIT THE BOOZE SECTION WOULD YOU ?? THEIR LOADS AND NOBDY TO STOP YOU .
THEN YOU POP DOWN THE LOCAL COP SHOP TO GET YOURSELF SOME CONFISCATED ARMS CS GAS ECT BUT LOW AND BEHOLD ITS ALSO FULL OF DRUGS .
WOULD YOU ???
SHOULD YOU ???
POST SHTF IS GOING TO BE VERY STRESSFUL IF DRINK AND DRUGS ARE EAZY TO COME BUY WOULD YOU GIVE IN TO
TEMPTATION
Major population die-off there may be, depending on the event but I wouldn't count on there being anything left. It would probably be preceded by mob rule, violence and looting...