Survival UK Forums › Discussion Area › Threats and Risks v
situational awareness

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
situational awareness
9 March 2013, 18:33, (This post was last modified: 9 March 2013, 18:38 by Luci_ferson.)
#9
Luci_ferson Offline
Member
 		Posts: 998
Threads: 25
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 4
RE: situational awareness
(9 March 2013, 18:26)Skean Dhude Wrote: I think that making the pedestrian at fault will fix it rather than blaming the driver. Squish. They didn't look.No insurance claim here. It'd cure it or eventually they will be wiped out. Darwins law. Our laws protect idiots.

years agoi i would have dissagreed but since the invention of phones and crap, its starting to look like they shouldnt auto blame anyone, they should just check both peoples phones.
90% of the time it will show one of them was just using it.
a copper nearly ran my m8 over 3 years ago in middlesborough, he was on a phone (the copper).
about 90% of england own phones.
but in about 60% of road traffic accidents il bet atleast one of those involved suddenly dont own one.
98% of it, is science, the rest is rainbows - Luci_ferson
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
situational awareness - by bigpaul - 8 March 2013, 15:34
RE: situational awareness - by Luci_ferson - 8 March 2013, 15:48
RE: situational awareness - by Wolfiesmith - 8 March 2013, 21:30
RE: situational awareness - by Tartar Horde - 9 March 2013, 12:38
RE: situational awareness - by Madgirl151 - 9 March 2013, 13:06
RE: situational awareness - by Geordie_Rob - 9 March 2013, 14:11
RE: situational awareness - by Ghost - 9 March 2013, 16:13
RE: situational awareness - by Skean Dhude - 9 March 2013, 18:26
RE: situational awareness - by Luci_ferson - 9 March 2013, 18:33

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)