Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
.380 Mk2z
3 February 2017, 20:06,
#8
RE: .380 Mk2z
Looking at the suggested load data for both cartridges, and looking at the firearm designs available for the 38S&W/380 I would have to place design restrictions on the use of "overloaded" .38 S&W rounds.

An "overload", meaning a .38 S&W round loaded to .38 spl standards, might be tolerable in a S&W model 10, or a Colt New Police revolver made during or after WW2. Both of those designs were manufactured to the same strength in both rounds as a matter of normal production. Both of those designs were routinely rechambered for .38spl by surplus dealers by the simple act of running a reamer into the cylinder. They continued to function flawlessly right up til today with the only normal complaint being that they swell the cases a bit on firing.

It would be different for the many Webley, Enfield, S&W top break, Iver Johnson and H&R revolvers. None of them are made to the same strength levels as the solid frame, side swing cylinder, Colt and S&W designs.

It is the weak hinge at the front and the potential for excess wear on the top latch that would concern me. I have seen many of the old top break revolvers that were worn to uselessness using standard loads, so an overload would be unacceptable in those designs.
__________
Every person should view freedom of speech as an essential right.
Without it you can not tell who the idiots are.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
.380 Mk2z - by CharlesHarris - 31 January 2017, 04:50
RE: .380 Mk2z - by Mortblanc - 31 January 2017, 19:11
RE: .380 Mk2z - by CharlesHarris - 31 January 2017, 21:58
RE: .380 Mk2z - by Mortblanc - 1 February 2017, 02:53
RE: .380 Mk2z - by Midnitemo - 1 February 2017, 13:55
RE: .380 Mk2z - by Mortblanc - 2 February 2017, 18:58
RE: .380 Mk2z - by CharlesHarris - 3 February 2017, 02:35
RE: .380 Mk2z - by Mortblanc - 3 February 2017, 20:06
RE: .380 Mk2z - by CharlesHarris - 4 February 2017, 00:45
RE: .380 Mk2z - by Mortblanc - 4 February 2017, 20:14

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)