Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
It's a lose-lose situation.
5 March 2012, 10:19,
#3
RE: It's a lose-lose situation.
(5 March 2012, 10:08)NorthernRaider Wrote: Why should nation A B C and D who have nuclear weapons themselves object to nation E having them when nation E has not started any wars or invaded any other countries within the last 100 years, unlike nations A,B,C and D ?

Couldn't put it better myself.


Sailing away, not close to the wind.Heart
Reply


Messages In This Thread
It's a lose-lose situation. - by Scythe13 - 5 March 2012, 09:23
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - by TOF - 5 March 2012, 10:19
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - by Scythe13 - 5 March 2012, 10:38
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - by Scythe13 - 5 March 2012, 12:20
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - by Scythe13 - 5 March 2012, 12:29
RE: It's a lose-lose situation. - by Scythe13 - 5 March 2012, 12:40

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)