UK collective retreats

[Timelord]

Hrusai wrote:-
"well there will be kinks to work out but personally i think a pragmatic and logical approach is simply the best idea, so for general decisions it would down to general consensus, but there would be lengthy debates on the others, whereupon their conclusion, there shall be a vote, either that or every decision and squabble would be solved by a roll of the dice, if lady luck is smiling then you win, this means that everyone would have an equal chance it'd be purely down to chance.

its a tough thing to answer because there is only one way of being "totally fair, which is random luck, but that might not always be the best idea as some stupid decisions would get through, i guess there would have to be rules in place to prevent this as much as possible, but all these things give rise to central power groups and people that moniter and enforce the rules ....i guess we'd have to figure it out as we go along really, but theres a few ideas

otherwise main rules are, you get what you work for, if your bone idle, you dont eat, everyone pulls their weight, duties cycle

at the end of the day there is no perfect system that meets your ideals, because they give rise to an idealistic world, which simply isnt possible, and while i'd be happy to be proven wrong about this, until such day i guess ill remain cynical"

****Please can you explain what any of this means? I Keep rereading it but it does not make any sense in relation to being an alternative type of society. Is the rolling dice/lady luck proposal for real? I do not see any coherent understanding of humanity, social interaction & historical precedence. Having an ideal and being idealistic are not the same thing.****


"and please dont think that just because i am only 18 i havent had much experience of the world, i've done and seen far more than a person of my age should have. "

WTF??