Risk Assessment

[bigpaul]

(8 June 2012, 10:43)Bug_out_Bag Wrote: I rated it '7 is not Ok' this is because as we can deduce from another thread on here that when people are stumped for something in a life or death situation they will become raiders.

I will only completely trust those known to me prior to the event. Like Kenneth, I would class myself as 'vulnerable' for reasons other than age. Unlike Kenneth I would not necessarily trust all who are ( sorry, not meaning to cause offence), here because they have posted useful info. How do we know that there are not some whose strategy to survive is by letting others do the hard work of getting prepared, storing the food, the water, the fuel, the meds and the like only to take advantage at a later date when they happen to be passing through your area, or worse, making a bee line straight to you?

Many preppers say they are well armed and play out agressive and blood thirsty strategies in posted, forum scenarios in a world WROL, I won't be taking any chances if I can help it! OPSEC = SURVIVAL. Head down, hiding out, low profile, bugging in the way to go for me.

OPSEC=SURVIVAL. Head down, hiding out,low profile, YES agree,agree,agree. bugging in MAY not be possible, depends on the situation at the time. bugging OUT= plan B