14 October 2012, 07:09
Nothing endures but change ~Heraclitus
Strangers in a tangled wilderness
|
14 October 2012, 07:30
Interesting read, but a bit rose tinted for me.
14 October 2012, 08:00
I agree, i think it will be a lot more hostile with marauding gangs on the look out for easy pickings, in my mind it would be safer to always keep on the move, that way one is always open to opportunity. Alternatively one must be prepared to defend what ever resources they have, it makes sense to adopt the hunter/forager lifeway eating as an when the oportunity arises but not accumulating large amounts that weigh you down, the less you have the less it will attract other predators plus you have the freedom to just up and move without so much preperation, less baggage is a good thing imho.
Nothing endures but change ~Heraclitus
14 October 2012, 09:25
A great THEORY, but like socialism impossible to make work in practise (i think), It cold only work in a world with such low numbers it would be just an educated version of nomadic hunter gathering
14 October 2012, 09:32
very interesting, a concept i am very happy with.
Some people that prefer to be alone arent anti-social they just have no time for drama, stupidity and false people.
14 October 2012, 12:19
Just a bit romanticised for me I think some reading it will think its easy living in the ruins of civilisation. I think I will stick to getting my advice from you guys at least you say how it is and what to expect.
True heroes don't wear football shirts, they wear dog tags.
14 October 2012, 12:28
who needs "civilisation"? if we are talking about life as it is now lived you can keep it, give me the fall of society anyday!
Some people that prefer to be alone arent anti-social they just have no time for drama, stupidity and false people.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|