(30 January 2013, 13:50)bigpaul Wrote: i'd still keep away from there though, especially after TSHTF when there is no one to monitor it.
While I would not go climbing around in the place, there should never be any problem above ground unless someone deliberately makes one. That could happen anywhere.
(30 January 2013, 13:57)BeardyMan Wrote: 1sq KM of above ground facilities, access roads built and whatever else is required.
They're on about putting it in a NATIONAL PARK!
Regardless of what it is, the nuclear thing doesn't bother me at all, it's the location. One of the few unspoilt places the UK has left.
The above ground stuff is going to be outside of the national park. While this is still a nice area, it does have to go somewhere.
(30 January 2013, 14:08)Prepper1 Wrote: Why don't they put it in london's abandoned stations... oh hang on that's too close to them, that's why they want it up there, far far away in case of accidents...
near the plebs...
Oh wait haven't they just given the go ahead for fracking in the u.k. again, that can cause geological faults to open....
I do not think Chalk and London clay create the geological stability for deep storage of nuclear wastes. What kind of accidents do you envisage and exactly who are 'the plebs' and so who are 'not the plebs'?
Search
Calendar
Help
