Posts: 6,038
Threads: 679
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
39
Okay, along similar veins, but slightly different.
How long until 'natural food stocks' e.g. fish in the rivers, animal populations, ocean animals, etc, increase to more bountiful levels?
Dissent is the highest form of Patriotism - Thomas Jefferson
Those who sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither - Benjamin Franklin
Posts: 1,831
Threads: 50
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
5
12 April 2014, 08:26
(This post was last modified: 12 April 2014, 08:28 by Midnitemo.)
Why would that happen?....you've lost me again!....they will surely go into decline with more people than ever looking to tap into these resources!
The oceans might recover a bit without factory fishing fleets out there but I don't see anything else improving.
Nothing is fool proof for a sufficiently talented fool!!!!
Posts: 1,922
Threads: 125
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
26
12 April 2014, 09:13
(This post was last modified: 12 April 2014, 09:14 by Lightspeed.)
Midnight I take S13s question to mean how long will it take for game and fish stocks to become plentiful ( again).
In immediate aftermath of a full on crash its to be expected that a lot of wildlife will be taken by people trying to survive.
After the human population declines to a level that matches the available food sources, only then will any remaining pockets of wildlife start to thrive and restock the landscape.
The time it'll take for stock to recover will very much depend on how badly depleted in numbers they are before recovery.
My guess is that it'll be 3 to 5 years before wildlife populations show signs of thriving again.
72 de
Lightspeed
26-SUKer-17
26-TM-580
STATUS: Bugged-In at the Bug-Out
Posts: 571
Threads: 22
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
6
I'd agree with NR on this,
You'd probably find a lot of waste initially, as people take a cow and cut off a leg and let the rest rot,
rabbits may flourish though? with less chemicals and pest control?
in some cases, those with the least to say, say the most.....
Posts: 1,922
Threads: 125
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
26
Good point about rabbits Binnie. Maybe they will be the primary wild meat for a good while.
72 de
Lightspeed
26-SUKer-17
26-TM-580
STATUS: Bugged-In at the Bug-Out
Posts: 1,831
Threads: 50
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
5
Hunting is currently a hobby mostly in this country undertaken by a small minority of the public the status quo seems to be kept quite nicely , occasionally a species have a good year, they starts to cause a problem and get culled back to manageable levels be it rabbits , foxes , deer whatever , when food becomes scarce everyone with a gun will be out looking to supplement the larder , there are currently significantly more gun owners who don't hunt than do in this country and I suspect every last one of them capable of hefting a gun will be willing to go hunt if there need is great enough.
Nothing is fool proof for a sufficiently talented fool!!!!
Posts: 1,831
Threads: 50
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
5
12 April 2014, 11:41
(This post was last modified: 12 April 2014, 11:46 by Midnitemo.)
That raises another issue , one of man's classic downfall's is greed , some hunters won't just take what they need but will take all they can to barter/sell onwards and there will be a load of people willing to trade for it
I used to take between 10 and twenty rabbits a week of the 18acre small holding I used to shoot over and I wasn't keeping pace , by the end of summer every year I'd get the ferret man in just the once and he'd take in excess of a hundred of the land in one session.....imagine what damage to the stocks that man could do if he was let loose to hunt everyday.
Nothing is fool proof for a sufficiently talented fool!!!!