Greenies Are Fighting the Soviet-Era Long War

[CharlesHarris]

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/06...migration/

My analysis of the above article is that the old Soviets are partying in their graves watching their long war active measures finally come to fruition. The environmental movement had its origins in Cold War active measures intended to undermine the industrial capacity of Western Europe and North America, curtailing further developent of oil and gas, so that societal decline would make those peoples more susceptible to Communist ideology.

When the USSR collapsed, many top ranking Soviets went into the Green movement, like Gorbachev. Others went to ground in the Middle East and Asia, especially the bio war folks.

When people are underemployed, someone waving bucks or Euros under their nose can unlock the full measure of obedient stupidity. My assessment is that the NWO folks like Soros have been able to breathe life back into many old Cold War ops that the Sovs were running, particularly those having an bility to show pseudo high humanitarian value, but with real goals of:

1) putting up a heavy smoke screen to stir up the “useful idiots” and

2) causing massive abandonment of traditional values, being replaced by egalitarian Communist tripe like resettlement, diluting culture, diluting ritual, while redefining reality for subject populations.

The environmental proposals in Eire will spark exodus of many good and talented people to the UK, Canada, and the USA.

But there is the real danger that a hard Brexit combined with this leftist loonie nonsense, may awaken the IRA to rekindle a massive revolution.

These whacko Irish environmental policies, if enacted, will initiate the greatest migration out of Ireland since the great famine of 1844-49.

[Skean Dhude]

(23 June 2019, 00:23)CharlesHarris Wrote: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/06...migration/
These whacko Irish environmental policies, if enacted, will initiate the greatest migration out of Ireland since the great famine of 1844-49.

I've come to the conclusion that our species is just plain dumb and too gullible. They have turned their back on thousands of years of successful process and are pushing untried and flawed touchy feeley ideology which is leading to a snowflake populace. The PTB know this but what they are aiming at is a docile population and it just won't work.

I see revolution in our futures and not too far away at that. The UK is disarmed so it will be slower but the US is going to be interesting over the next few years.

The right have always been about fairness and striving to be better. The left have always been about equality at the lowest level.

What a situation we are leaving our kids.

[LAC]

It's interesting that what is never mentioned in climate debates is that 97% of scientists concur that the climate is changing, but what is always left out by the MSM is the fact that about half of those scientists also believe that human activity in contributing to that change is negligible, and that it's likely to do with long term natural climate cycles and sun activity.

What I also find a bit depressing is the way they try to turn it back to the common man - ie it's your carbon footprint, it's your lifestyle etc. From a purely financial perspective corporations involved in fossil fuels have absolutely no incentive to develop alternative energy, why would they when they are sitting on trillions of dollars/pounds of future revenue? And what can governments do about that anyway? Geopolitically of course, fossil fuels are the currency of power and hold and check that balance of power in terms of wealth, mechanised warefare, and punishment sanctions used short of a physical war.

It's a clever strategy to divide and rule and deflect from the real issue of why alternative energy is not being, or is painfully slow, to be developed. I know a student who after many years obtained his PHD in electrical engineering and secured a job at the renewables department at a large oil company. He told me when he first started he was very enthusiastic and literally had hundreds of alternative energy developers contacting him with patents. But when he actually tried to take these forward with senior managers he met with delays excuses and frustrations. After a while he realised his job was actually just to be there in place so that when questions were asked about what they were doing to develop renewable energy they could say they have a department in place with experts working on it to cover themselves.

I suspect the climate change machine is being driven in order to bring in more and more control of the general population to:

1) Keep people contained in smaller more technologically controlled urban areas (surveillance) - smart homes etc.
2) To remove the ability of people to live outside to system on land they own to farm and be off grid. I've heard that is some states in the USA there's little point in owning land as there is virtually nothing you can do with it. So they're not making private land ownership illegal, just pointless to own.
3) In reference to the above 2, when more land becomes available then governments and corporations will swaller it up cheap, thereby consolidating their wealth and power and ability to hold the general population to ransom as they control more and more of the food supply.

[Mortblanc]

The fanatics promoting climate change and controls over human behavior patterns are no different than the followers that have promoted and spread any other religious movement in human history.

And climate change is a religion, do not kid yourselves. It simply places human beings as the deity, able to control and change nature. Human beings that do not toe the religious party line are therefore bad people and not redeemable. An enemy of the theocracy.

Yes, when governments and their leaders fall under this spell they are a theocracy.

Almost all religions in agricultural societies were formed around the need to control the climate.

You make God mad he sends drought and plague. It was the same for the fertile crescent 5,000 years ago as it is today.

It is simply now the "scientists" and their reports being misquoted and manipulated and not a priest, prophet or scripture.

It is much easier to control a population when they feel the needless and unexplained sacrifices they are making will save the world.

[Skean Dhude]

It's just another name for control. That is why they are called watermelons. Green on the outside, Red on the inside.

[CharlesHarris]

If you would believe your 97% of scientists, the only hope for saving the earth is global nuclear war to reduce the excess population, starting with the non-producing and over-popuylated areas of Africa and Asia.

Regardness of how well the EU and Canada do in reducing their carbon footprint, and even if the US would elect a Democrat and impose stringent measures, the combined effects would not be enough to offset the greenhouse gases produced by China, India and Russia.

About 200 megatons dispersed over 1000 warheads in key cities, followed by two years of nuclear winter should reduce world population by about 3 billion, bringing population numbers down to 1980 levels which should be more sustainable.

https://www.worldometers.info/world-popu...n-by-year/

[Straight Shooter]

Well we are all singing off the same hymn sheet on this one.......nothing to add from SS ...great coment .

[LAC]

https://youtu.be/xRXzfJVcV6s

Found this little gem, pretty much confirms all of the comments but with more detail.