Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
6 November 2012, 19:41,
#5
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
My thoughts for what it's worth.
After all you've stated the ROL has collapsed.

1. Trust no one, it cuts out indecision.

2. If the ROL has collapsed, them walking towards you will know that too.

3. If them approaching you can't understand the command "Stay away" or "Stop!" they probably wouldn't have stopped anyway.

4. It's their fault if they keep coming after that with or without open hands.

5. Everyone who smiles at you is not necessarily friendly.

Finally:-

6. If you get it wrong and they kill you, who's going to protect your own?

Items 1 to 5 colors my judgement when assessing threat.
Item 6 Clinches it.

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:13
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by Paul - 6 November 2012, 19:41
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:58
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 20:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 6 November 2012, 20:33
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 21:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 09:17
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 12:43
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 7 November 2012, 20:20
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 9 November 2012, 01:03

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)