Survival UK Forums › Discussion Area › An Open Box v
Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
6 November 2012, 21:23,
#14
IB1 Offline
Member
 		Posts: 204
Threads: 8
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 0
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
Another thing to consider with being open to strangers approaching is that you have no idea if they are carrying disease. They may be well intentioned and mean you no harm but if they are carrying a disease then you and your family could be screwed. If the world is that shot to bits that shooting people is an viable option then you can guarantee that disease will be rife too
You have the right to hold any beliefs you want. You do not have the right to have those beliefs automatically respected
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:13
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:58
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 20:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 6 November 2012, 20:33
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 21:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 09:17
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 12:43
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 7 November 2012, 20:20
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 9 November 2012, 01:03

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)