Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
7 November 2012, 12:40,
#32
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
my thinking is this: my duty is to my immediate family and NO ONE else,in a SHTF/WROL/TEOTWAWKI situation i cannot be responsible for every waif and stray, no matter what their problem, like someone said if their not an immediate threat they might be carrying a disease one that might not be apparent for 10 days to a fortnight...are you going to endanger your group/family for a complete stranger?? even if no disease we assume they have no food or else why would they come begging? any food you give them is LESS for your group and lessens your groups chances of survival.
Some people that prefer to be alone arent anti-social they just have no time for drama, stupidity and false people.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:13
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:58
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 20:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 6 November 2012, 20:33
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 21:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 09:17
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 12:43
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by bigpaul - 7 November 2012, 12:40
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 7 November 2012, 20:20
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 9 November 2012, 01:03

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)