Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
8 November 2012, 20:54,
#63
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
Wait a second NR. Didn't you say FEMA was a great success by the Obama administration? I'm 100% certain you did. It's okay to be wrong mate.


Looks like having a group of people willing to help in a crisis situation, that is pretty much WROL, is a good thing. Granted it's not international, and the situation has a viable end in site. But the principle of temporary (pretty short term) WROL (something I didn't initially account for) does seem to suggest it would be right to help those we can.

Obviously, if there was no sight of restoring ROL, then it would very possibly be a completely different situation.
Dissent is the highest form of Patriotism - Thomas Jefferson
Those who sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither - Benjamin Franklin
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:13
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:58
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 20:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 6 November 2012, 20:33
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 21:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 09:17
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 12:43
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 7 November 2012, 20:20
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 9 November 2012, 01:03
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by Scythe13 - 8 November 2012, 20:54

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)