SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

Hello There, Guest! Register

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

15 November 2012, 14:52,

#53

OpSecRadio Offline

Offline

Monitoring CB CH 9 & 145.500 VHF

Posts: 87
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 2

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

Thanks TLN

I tested both images on the UV-5Rplus, BFB 291, and both images worked fine, it would be good to know if they are backwards compatible with earlier versions.

I think there is now a newer version, BFB293, available - it would be good if any members have this or a later version and could also test the images for forwards compatibility.

73 de
OSR

The duty of a true patriot is to protect his country from its government ~ Thomas Paine

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 09:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:08

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:13

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:17

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 11:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Scythe13 - 6 November 2012, 11:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 11:18

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 11:50

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Tdvsko - 6 November 2012, 11:07

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 6 November 2012, 11:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BrixhamBadger - 6 November 2012, 11:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 12:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BrixhamBadger - 6 November 2012, 11:59

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 13:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Keithb - 6 November 2012, 14:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 14:10

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 15:08

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 15:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 15:31

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 6 November 2012, 17:50

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 18:40

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Bug_out_Bag - 6 November 2012, 20:57

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 6 November 2012, 23:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 6 November 2012, 23:26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 23:59

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 7 November 2012, 00:22

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 07:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 6 November 2012, 23:29

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 11:27

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 11:57

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 12:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 12:10

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 12:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 12:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 13:09

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 16:43

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 16:55

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 17:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 17:09

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 17:41

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 18:32

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 18:44

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 11 November 2012, 08:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 11 November 2012, 15:07

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 12 November 2012, 07:56

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 11 November 2012, 16:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 11 November 2012, 20:27

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 11 November 2012, 21:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 14:46

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 15 November 2012, 14:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 19:54

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 15 November 2012, 21:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 21:49

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 22:20

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 22:49

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 16 November 2012, 20:29

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 16 November 2012, 21:38

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 17 November 2012, 12:51

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 17 November 2012, 15:21

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 18 November 2012, 00:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Destiny - 19 November 2012, 22:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 22 November 2012, 15:05

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 22 November 2012, 15:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 22 November 2012, 18:36

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 22 November 2012, 18:41

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 22 November 2012, 21:28

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 22 November 2012, 22:39

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 23 November 2012, 09:20

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 23 November 2012, 18:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 26 November 2012, 09:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 23 November 2012, 18:18

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 23 November 2012, 19:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 26 November 2012, 10:28

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 26 November 2012, 11:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 26 November 2012, 11:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 27 November 2012, 12:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 27 November 2012, 13:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 27 November 2012, 13:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 27 November 2012, 13:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 27 November 2012, 14:25

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 28 November 2012, 22:56

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Shaysdad99 - 7 December 2012, 19:35

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 7 December 2012, 22:53

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 8 December 2012, 08:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Shaysdad99 - 8 December 2012, 11:24

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 1 January 2013, 22:58

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BeardyMan - 3 January 2013, 09:15

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 5 January 2013, 12:24

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 5 January 2013, 14:19

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 6 January 2013, 12:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 26 April 2013, 11:40

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 26 April 2013, 20:43

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Jonas - 9 June 2013, 16:30

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 6 June 2013, 16:19

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 7 June 2013, 12:25

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 8 June 2013, 23:26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 11 June 2013, 09:36

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)