(6 January 2013, 00:29)BDG Wrote: The only none ally who could realistically launch such a strike and not have most of their stuff shot down is Russia. Russia is not going to attack us.
Biggest threat nuke wise is in the UK is a bomb that comes in on a ship, but who ever could do that would much rather nuke America. Anyone want to bet £50,000 with me, I take the position the UK will not be attacked with nuclear weapons in the next 30 years.
If you want to go higher, we can, just do not want to scare any one off playing for real money - £50K will buy little more than a banger for running around in in 30 years. I am more than happy to play for £2.27M at the moment.
The problem I have in discussing this subject even with preppers is the lack of familiarity people have with long term geopolitical aims of the major powers. That's why I try to ease the subject in through mainstream references, such as Rosenbaum's book of last year which asserts, plainly, that the major powers are preparing for - at the minimum - a limited yet global nuclear war in the near future.
In my view, for what it's worth, key world events must precede it. The west has to be locked down and that includes the web, with dissidents quietened, and potential "insurgents" aka US patriots stood down / disarmed / interned. The winder western populations have to be placed on a war footing, or to be blunt, manipulated into a sense of patriotic readiness in the face of horrific austerity (think WW2 rationing).
I want to write much more but my toddlers are playing up here... Later!
Search
Calendar
Help
