Debating the debaters

[Timelord]

A house with two adults uses far more resources per person than a house with 8 in. The 8 have to live somewhere and based on the two per house model, that would equal 4 houses instead of one. By this system, the two in the one house should pay more per head than the house with 8 in.
This shows that you can argue black is white and visa versa just like politicians. so who cares?

Another thing, as per NR's earlier post - in a JUST & FAIR SOCIETY (catchy last word don't you think - "SOCIETY") then the labour is not divided equally due to the presence of different specialisms within it. This allows an advancement of the society from a subsistence level. Inherently this produces discrepancies in the fair balance of labour or at any rate to the individuals perception of it. Measuring what a diverse range of individuals with varying specialisms or without any specialism actually uses and being able to quantify what is JUST & FAIR is not as simple as saying everyone pays for their share of what they use.. I presume this would be at a standardised same rate across the board. Sounds suspiciously like a general social policy to me? Isn't it weird how words can go round & round? lol, TL.[/align]