Debating the debaters

[Timelord]

Neither is fair as both views are diametrically polarised. The scenario I suggested was just showing that. In reality it would only be fair if every individual was measured against their environmental and economic impact. Of the two views already put forward, one is taken from the ideal of the tax being based on the individual and the other view is taken from the ideal of the tax being based on the property. As shown this does not work fairly in the environmental and in the economic areas at the same time with different amounts of residents. What is needed is a system that takes into account the variables. As usual the politicians like to set one area of society against the other rather than have the attention turned in their direction. How a successful system would be worked I expect would be a minefield of conflicting interests. Regards, TL.

---

Your suggestion of £500 each as a midway figure goes some way to solving that. Maybe you should run for a local parliamentary candidate? ... Then again you probably just showed too much common sense for that. lol