SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

Hello There, Guest! Register

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

6 November 2012, 10:17,

#5

Lightspeed Offline

Offline

Member

Posts: 1,922
Threads: 125
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

(6 November 2012, 10:13)NorthernRaider Wrote: I'll deinately be keeping full copies of all your excellent research that is an absolute certainty,thers absolutely nothing wrong with it, i just only need the first bit

Exactly right NR:

QUOTE: <<1. PMR446 Un-coded: No programming possible. Just use OPERATING PROTOCOLS that will be determined later in this sequence of threads.>>

72 de

Lightspeed
26-SUKer-17

26-TM-580

STATUS: Bugged-In at the Bug-Out

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 09:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:08

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:13

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:17

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 11:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Scythe13 - 6 November 2012, 11:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 11:18

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 11:50

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Tdvsko - 6 November 2012, 11:07

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 6 November 2012, 11:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BrixhamBadger - 6 November 2012, 11:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 12:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BrixhamBadger - 6 November 2012, 11:59

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 13:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Keithb - 6 November 2012, 14:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 14:10

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 15:08

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 15:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 15:31

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 6 November 2012, 17:50

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 18:40

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Bug_out_Bag - 6 November 2012, 20:57

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 6 November 2012, 23:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 6 November 2012, 23:26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 23:59

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 7 November 2012, 00:22

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 07:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 6 November 2012, 23:29

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 11:27

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 11:57

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 12:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 12:10

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 12:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 12:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 13:09

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 16:43

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 16:55

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 17:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 17:09

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 17:41

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 18:32

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 18:44

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 11 November 2012, 08:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 11 November 2012, 15:07

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 12 November 2012, 07:56

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 11 November 2012, 16:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 11 November 2012, 20:27

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 11 November 2012, 21:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 14:46

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 15 November 2012, 14:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 19:54

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 15 November 2012, 21:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 21:49

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 22:20

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 22:49

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 16 November 2012, 20:29

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 16 November 2012, 21:38

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 17 November 2012, 12:51

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 17 November 2012, 15:21

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 18 November 2012, 00:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Destiny - 19 November 2012, 22:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 22 November 2012, 15:05

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 22 November 2012, 15:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 22 November 2012, 18:36

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 22 November 2012, 18:41

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 22 November 2012, 21:28

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 22 November 2012, 22:39

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 23 November 2012, 09:20

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 23 November 2012, 18:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 26 November 2012, 09:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 23 November 2012, 18:18

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 23 November 2012, 19:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 26 November 2012, 10:28

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 26 November 2012, 11:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 26 November 2012, 11:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 27 November 2012, 12:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 27 November 2012, 13:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 27 November 2012, 13:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 27 November 2012, 13:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 27 November 2012, 14:25

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 28 November 2012, 22:56

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Shaysdad99 - 7 December 2012, 19:35

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 7 December 2012, 22:53

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 8 December 2012, 08:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Shaysdad99 - 8 December 2012, 11:24

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 1 January 2013, 22:58

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BeardyMan - 3 January 2013, 09:15

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 5 January 2013, 12:24

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 5 January 2013, 14:19

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 6 January 2013, 12:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 26 April 2013, 11:40

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 26 April 2013, 20:43

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Jonas - 9 June 2013, 16:30

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 6 June 2013, 16:19

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 7 June 2013, 12:25

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 8 June 2013, 23:26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 11 June 2013, 09:36

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)