Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)
11 June 2013, 09:36,
RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)
It always makes me laugh that penalties for these 'serious' offences are punished much more than the 'minor' offences such as burglary, rape and murder and it is well known that most hams support the stasi looking after their little cliques. They are not the only group that elevate themselves above everyone else but they seem to be the worst in actively getting involved in tracking people down.

But leaving that beside I have no intention of transmitting whilst the stasi are in charge and just want to have the equipment which is not illegal set up and made ready to go by a more flexible ham. It is no different to TV licensing. It is possible to stay within the law and yet set up our systems ready for an event.

Incidently on my travels I came across what I thought was a GCHQ substation but in fact turned out to the home of a local ham. He is a friend of a friend of mine so I'll find out a little bit more about him. All I know so far is he has been doing this for over 60 years.
Skean Dhude
-------------------------------
It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change. - Charles Darwin
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 6 November 2012, 17:50
RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 7 November 2012, 00:22
RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 21:49
RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 22:49
RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 17 November 2012, 15:21
RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 11 June 2013, 09:36

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)