Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
7 November 2012, 10:22,
#21
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets'
I'm a survivalist not a soldier, I WAS a soldier but and now 100% civilian, I will also choose avoiding conflict and withdrawing where possible ( But attacking with massive sudden mericless force if I absolutely have to), I cannot afford any of my group taking gunshot wounds, esp with limited and declining medical support. Theres no combat medics to save me, no choppers to casevac me. I will always give ground unless I have no other alternative. But if I'm reluctantly forced to fight it will be full on and they wont get chance to try again. You wont find anything Ramboish in my group.

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:13
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 6 November 2012, 19:58
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 20:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 6 November 2012, 20:33
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 6 November 2012, 21:23
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 09:17
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by NorthernRaider - 7 November 2012, 10:22
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by uks - 7 November 2012, 12:43
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by IB1 - 7 November 2012, 20:20
RE: Thoughts on WROL and engaging 'targets' - by BDG - 9 November 2012, 01:03

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)