SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

Hello There, Guest! Register

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

6 November 2012, 11:45, (This post was last modified: 6 November 2012, 11:46 by BrixhamBadger.)

#13

BrixhamBadger Offline

Offline

Surreal Surrealist.

Posts: 375
Threads: 31
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 7

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

Link not working L.S... just got this message:

This listing (BaoFeng-UV-5R-...27c8556e2e) has been removed, or this item is not available.
Please check that you've entered the correct item number
Listings that have ended 90 or more days ago will not be available for viewing.

This one works: http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/?ie=UTF8&keywo...2yl955st_e

Dodgy

If you always have, on your person, at least 2 ways to make fire, you might be a prepper. Tongue

Tongue

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 09:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:08

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:13

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:17

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 11:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Scythe13 - 6 November 2012, 11:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 11:18

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 11:50

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Tdvsko - 6 November 2012, 11:07

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 6 November 2012, 11:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BrixhamBadger - 6 November 2012, 11:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 12:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BrixhamBadger - 6 November 2012, 11:59

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 13:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Keithb - 6 November 2012, 14:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 14:10

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 15:08

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 15:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 15:31

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 6 November 2012, 17:50

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 18:40

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Bug_out_Bag - 6 November 2012, 20:57

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 6 November 2012, 23:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 6 November 2012, 23:26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 23:59

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 7 November 2012, 00:22

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 07:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 6 November 2012, 23:29

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 11:27

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 11:57

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 12:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 12:10

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 12:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 12:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 13:09

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 16:43

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 16:55

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 17:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 17:09

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 17:41

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 18:32

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 18:44

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 11 November 2012, 08:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 11 November 2012, 15:07

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 12 November 2012, 07:56

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 11 November 2012, 16:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 11 November 2012, 20:27

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 11 November 2012, 21:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 14:46

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 15 November 2012, 14:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 19:54

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 15 November 2012, 21:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 21:49

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 22:20

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 22:49

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 16 November 2012, 20:29

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 16 November 2012, 21:38

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 17 November 2012, 12:51

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 17 November 2012, 15:21

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 18 November 2012, 00:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Destiny - 19 November 2012, 22:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 22 November 2012, 15:05

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 22 November 2012, 15:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 22 November 2012, 18:36

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 22 November 2012, 18:41

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 22 November 2012, 21:28

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 22 November 2012, 22:39

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 23 November 2012, 09:20

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 23 November 2012, 18:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 26 November 2012, 09:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 23 November 2012, 18:18

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 23 November 2012, 19:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 26 November 2012, 10:28

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 26 November 2012, 11:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 26 November 2012, 11:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 27 November 2012, 12:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 27 November 2012, 13:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 27 November 2012, 13:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 27 November 2012, 13:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 27 November 2012, 14:25

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 28 November 2012, 22:56

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Shaysdad99 - 7 December 2012, 19:35

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 7 December 2012, 22:53

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 8 December 2012, 08:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Shaysdad99 - 8 December 2012, 11:24

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 1 January 2013, 22:58

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BeardyMan - 3 January 2013, 09:15

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 5 January 2013, 12:24

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 5 January 2013, 14:19

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 6 January 2013, 12:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 26 April 2013, 11:40

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 26 April 2013, 20:43

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Jonas - 9 June 2013, 16:30

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 6 June 2013, 16:19

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 7 June 2013, 12:25

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 8 June 2013, 23:26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 11 June 2013, 09:36

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)