SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

Hello There, Guest! Register

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

11 November 2012, 08:00,

#46

Lightspeed Offline

Offline

Member

Posts: 1,922
Threads: 125
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal)

PROGRESS:

As per G5's idea, two Programming protocols for the UV5r have been completed.

One is for Pre-SHTF: This one has all PMR446 and LPD frequencies programmed for Transmit and receive, and all other frequencies programmed for listening only. All channels are labelled with individual names, so that frequencies do not have to be remembered.

The other is identical to the first, but has transmit enabled on all channels

A BIG thank you to Gary for Beta testing both images, which appear to be functioning as intended.

We'll test some more over the weekend, and if satisfied with results, I'll post the images for download on this thread next week.

72 de

Lightspeed
26-SUKer-17

26-TM-580

STATUS: Bugged-In at the Bug-Out

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 09:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:08

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:13

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:17

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 10:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 10:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 11:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Scythe13 - 6 November 2012, 11:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 11:18

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 11:50

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Tdvsko - 6 November 2012, 11:07

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 6 November 2012, 11:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BrixhamBadger - 6 November 2012, 11:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 12:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BrixhamBadger - 6 November 2012, 11:59

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 13:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Keithb - 6 November 2012, 14:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 14:10

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 15:08

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 15:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 6 November 2012, 15:31

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 6 November 2012, 17:50

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 18:40

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Bug_out_Bag - 6 November 2012, 20:57

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 6 November 2012, 23:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 6 November 2012, 23:26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 6 November 2012, 23:59

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 7 November 2012, 00:22

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 07:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 6 November 2012, 23:29

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 11:27

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 11:57

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 12:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 12:10

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 12:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 12:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 13:09

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 16:43

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 16:55

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 17:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 17:09

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 17:41

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 7 November 2012, 18:32

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 7 November 2012, 18:44

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 11 November 2012, 08:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 11 November 2012, 15:07

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 12 November 2012, 07:56

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 11 November 2012, 16:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 11 November 2012, 20:27

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 11 November 2012, 21:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 14:46

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 15 November 2012, 14:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 19:54

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 15 November 2012, 21:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 21:49

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 15 November 2012, 22:20

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 15 November 2012, 22:49

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 16 November 2012, 20:29

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 16 November 2012, 21:38

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 17 November 2012, 12:51

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Paul - 17 November 2012, 15:21

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 18 November 2012, 00:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Destiny - 19 November 2012, 22:01

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 22 November 2012, 15:05

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 22 November 2012, 15:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 22 November 2012, 18:36

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 22 November 2012, 18:41

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 22 November 2012, 21:28

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 22 November 2012, 22:39

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 23 November 2012, 09:20

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Mandlaka - 23 November 2012, 18:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 26 November 2012, 09:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 23 November 2012, 18:18

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 23 November 2012, 19:03

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 26 November 2012, 10:28

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 26 November 2012, 11:23

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 26 November 2012, 11:45

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 27 November 2012, 12:52

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by NorthernRaider - 27 November 2012, 13:00

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 27 November 2012, 13:04

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 27 November 2012, 13:42

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by OpSecRadio - 27 November 2012, 14:25

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by The Local Ned - 28 November 2012, 22:56

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Shaysdad99 - 7 December 2012, 19:35

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 7 December 2012, 22:53

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Lightspeed - 8 December 2012, 08:16

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Shaysdad99 - 8 December 2012, 11:24

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 1 January 2013, 22:58

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by BeardyMan - 3 January 2013, 09:15

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 5 January 2013, 12:24

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 5 January 2013, 14:19

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 6 January 2013, 12:02

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 26 April 2013, 11:40

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Highlander - 26 April 2013, 20:43

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Jonas - 9 June 2013, 16:30

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 6 June 2013, 16:19

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 7 June 2013, 12:25

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Franc - 8 June 2013, 23:26

RE: SUK HT PROGRAMMING PROTOCOL (proposal) - by Skean Dhude - 11 June 2013, 09:36

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)