After This No Activity???

[Skean Dhude]

I don't think they need to plant anyone in this particular case. Most lefties go ballistic without any provocation whatsoever.

Just get some popcorn and watch as socialist scumbags get violent and carted off to spend a few hours in cells before using their dole money to pay fines over the next 10 years.

[bigpaul]

usual unwashed, student, anarchy, leftist "rent a mob" with no respect for anyone or anything.

[Devonian]

Apparently 20th June is the planned date for a series of coordinated nationwide protests with the main ones, of course being in London

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/l...faced.html

http://www.thepeoplesassembly.org.uk/

[Steve]

(12 May 2015, 10:19)bigpaul Wrote: usual unwashed, student, anarchy, leftist "rent a mob" with no respect for anyone or anything.

Yeah, just look at them;





Oops, they're both undercover cops who infiltrated legal protest groups. Bad example.

So, they definitely wouldn't have undercover agents in mobs, encouraging people to throw bottles at police lines would they.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009...ovacateurs

Oops again, not my day is it.

[MaryN]

Honestly, what is there to say? The election is over; no protest is going to make an iota of difference. Save your energy for things that are important.

[Barneyboy]

Nice one Steve

---

I guess we just stand by any do nowt

[BeardyMan]

(10 May 2015, 01:29)Mortblanc Wrote: I believe in literacy requirements and dedication to the nation based on service. I also believe that no one receiving benefits, except for disability or retirement, should have the vote. I also go so far as to say there should be a property ownership requirement.

Thats possibly the best voting overhaul we could ever hope for. Won't happen over here though unfortunately Mort.

I'm pleased with the result, I run my own business so had labour \ snp got in I would have been in real trouble. Plus they would have imported millions of extra votes, just as labour did before. The greenarty wanted to triple foreign aid, no one with any common sense thinks thats a good idea. Shame our friend Nigel didn't get in.

Will it change my prepping? Not now, steady as she goes as far as I'm concerned. Had it been a different result then yes.

[Steve]

(12 May 2015, 21:45)BeardyMan Wrote:

(10 May 2015, 01:29)Mortblanc Wrote: I believe in literacy requirements and dedication to the nation based on service. I also believe that no one receiving benefits, except for disability or retirement, should have the vote. I also go so far as to say there should be a property ownership requirement.

Thats possibly the best voting overhaul we could ever hope for. Won't happen over here though unfortunately Mort.

It's a return to Serfdom.

[BeardyMan]

(12 May 2015, 21:55)Steve Wrote:

(12 May 2015, 21:45)BeardyMan Wrote:

(10 May 2015, 01:29)Mortblanc Wrote: I believe in literacy requirements and dedication to the nation based on service. I also believe that no one receiving benefits, except for disability or retirement, should have the vote. I also go so far as to say there should be a property ownership requirement.

Thats possibly the best voting overhaul we could ever hope for. Won't happen over here though unfortunately Mort.

It's a return to Serfdom.

Serfdom : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom

Nope, I don't think so.

[Steve]

(12 May 2015, 21:58)BeardyMan Wrote:

(12 May 2015, 21:55)Steve Wrote:

(12 May 2015, 21:45)BeardyMan Wrote:

(10 May 2015, 01:29)Mortblanc Wrote: I believe in literacy requirements and dedication to the nation based on service. I also believe that no one receiving benefits, except for disability or retirement, should have the vote. I also go so far as to say there should be a property ownership requirement.

Thats possibly the best voting overhaul we could ever hope for. Won't happen over here though unfortunately Mort.

It's a return to Serfdom.

Serfdom : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom

Nope, I don't think so.

Well let's look at it long term. Literacy requirements means excluding those from the poorest backgrounds, property ownership means the same plus some youngsters from the middle classes, excluding benefits recipients means excluding everyone on tax credits and receiving child benefits. That probably equals 50% of the UK population. These people will see their living standards slipping.

So, the 50% with the vote - the property owning, privately educated, earning above the tax-credit limit 50% - what incentive will they have to vote for changes that remove those differences ? None.

We'll have a society divided. We know what happens next - revolution or repression. The armed forces ( by their service ) will not be in the bottom 50%, so perhaps they'll be less than sympathetic to the poor.

I could be wrong though, perhaps it'll all be great.